Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

The Yamaha MT-09 2013 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 are both naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have some notable differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the Yamaha MT-09 2013, it is equipped with an in-line engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. It has a three-cylinder configuration and a displacement of 847 ccm. The front suspension features a telescopic fork, and the frame is made of aluminum with a twin tube design. The front brakes are double disk, and the bike has a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is 180 mm, and the diameter is also 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1440 mm, and the seat height is 815 mm. The bike weighs 191 kg (with ABS) and has a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is equipped with an in-line engine that delivers a higher power output of 160 horsepower and 111 Nm of torque. It has a four-cylinder configuration and a displacement of 998 ccm. The front suspension features an upside-down telescopic fork, and the frame is made of aluminum with a Deltabox design. The front brakes are double disk, and the bike has the same front tire width and diameter as the MT-09 (120 mm and 17 inches). However, the rear tire width is wider at 190 mm, and the diameter is also 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1400 mm, and the seat height is slightly higher at 825 mm. The bike weighs 210 kg (with ABS) and has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 stands out for its reasonable price and powerful engine. It offers a good balance between affordability and performance, making it an attractive option for riders looking for a capable naked bike.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 has several strengths that set it apart. It features a great chassis, which contributes to its excellent ride comfort and utility comfort. The electronic chassis enhances the overall riding experience, making it more enjoyable and convenient. The engine of the MT-10 SP is described as very emotional yet cultivated, providing a thrilling ride without compromising on smoothness. The bike also offers pleasant wind protection, which adds to the rider's comfort. Overall, the MT-10 SP is considered a balanced package, despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 2013 is criticized for its hard chassis, which may affect the overall comfort and handling. Additionally, it has a relatively high fuel consumption, which may be a concern for riders looking for better fuel efficiency.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is noted to have traction control that is not up to the level of the Aprilia, which may be a drawback for riders seeking advanced safety features. Furthermore, the seating position on the racetrack is described as too inactive, which may limit the bike's performance in high-speed or aggressive riding scenarios.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 are both powerful naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have distinct differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths. The MT-09 offers a reasonable price and a powerful engine, while the MT-10 SP boasts a great chassis, high ride comfort, and a thrilling yet refined engine. However, both bikes have their weaknesses, such as the hard chassis and high consumption of the MT-09, and the traction control and seating position issues of the MT-10 SP.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2013 compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2013
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

With the SP version, the MT-10 becomes cooler, more desirable and, thanks to the high-quality chassis, better. The semi-active suspension from the R1M is the best in the naked bike league. Highest quality and best function in combination. The chassis also excites on the racetrack. Nevertheless, the MT-10SP is not a racing machine, because the seating position is not active enough for that.

great chassis

high ride comfort / utility comfort due to the electronic chassis

very emotional but nevertheless cultivated engine

pleasant wind protection

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Traction control not up to the level of the Aprilia

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2013 and a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 123 days for a Yamaha MT-10 SP. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 18 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 SP since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 28,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 SP published on 10/4/2016.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth