Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power60 HPEngine power54 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement625 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,510 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight140 kgDry Weight148 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11.2 l
Top SpeedTop Speed160 km/hTop Speed169 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

KTM 640 LC4 Enduro 2005

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH