BMW M 1000 R 2023 vs. Suzuki B-King 2009

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

Loading...

Overview - BMW M 1000 R 2023 vs Suzuki B-King 2009

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

Technical Specifications BMW M 1000 R 2023 compared to Suzuki B-King 2009

BMW M 1000 R 2023
Suzuki B-King 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke65 mm
Engine powerEngine power210 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque113 NmTorque146 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,200 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.3 Compression Ratio12.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,340 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,220 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth800 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,525 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height840 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)259 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed280 km/hTop Speed247 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

The M 1000 R is definitely well done and the whole package fits. Even though it is certainly aimed more at sporty riders, the bike can also prove itself well on longer country road rides with minor restrictions in terms of riding comfort. The lower, straight handlebars and forward seating position in combination with the higher footrests automatically result in a sportier dynamic that does not give rise to couch feelings, especially on longer rides. On the other hand, there is good contact with the front wheel and sufficient lean angle freedom. In combination with the powerful drive, the Hyper Naked definitely plays in the top league. Apart from slight vibrations, the powerful RR engine is a force to be reckoned with in the naked segment. The new electronics help even less experienced riders to release the concentrated power in a controlled manner with conservative settings.

powerful and at the same time well controllable motor

great and adjustable electronics

good feedback from the chassis

stable brakes

Surprisingly manoeuvrable when desired

Standard cruise control and heated grips top for country road use

High price

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW M 1000 R vs Suzuki B-King

Price BMW M 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki B-King

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG