Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

The Kawasaki Ninja 650 model year 2017 and the Kawasaki Ninja 400 model year 2023 are both sporty motorcycles with similar engine types and configurations. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Ninja 650 2017 features a larger bore of 83 mm and stroke of 60 mm, resulting in a higher displacement of 649 ccm compared to the Ninja 400 2023's bore of 70 mm, stroke of 51.8 mm, and displacement of 399 ccm. This translates to a higher engine power of 68.2 HP and torque of 65.7 Nm for the Ninja 650 2017, while the Ninja 400 2023 has a slightly lower engine power of 45 HP and torque of 37 Nm. Additionally, the Ninja 650 2017 has a compression ratio of 10.8, while the Ninja 400 2023 has a higher compression ratio of 11.5.

Both models feature a similar suspension setup with telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The front suspension diameter is also the same at 41 mm. However, there are slight differences in the chassis specifications. The Ninja 650 2017 has a frame type of tubular steel and a rake of 65.5 degrees, while the Ninja 400 2023 also has a tubular steel frame but with a slightly lower rake of 63 degrees. The trail measurement is 100 mm for the Ninja 650 2017 and 92 mm for the Ninja 400 2023.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

In terms of braking, the Ninja 650 2017 is equipped with double disc brakes with a diameter of 300 mm, while the Ninja 400 2023 has a single disc brake with a larger diameter of 310 mm. Both models feature petal technology for improved heat dissipation. Additionally, both models come with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

The dimensions and weights of the two models also differ slightly. The Ninja 650 2017 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 160 mm, while the Ninja 400 2023 has a slightly narrower front tire width of 110 mm and a rear tire width of 150 mm. Both models have a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter. The wheelbase is longer for the Ninja 650 2017 at 1410 mm compared to the Ninja 400 2023's wheelbase of 1370 mm. The seat height is also slightly higher for the Ninja 650 2017 at 790 mm compared to the Ninja 400 2023's seat height of 785 mm. The Ninja 650 2017 is also heavier with a kerb weight of 193 kg compared to the Ninja 400 2023's kerb weight of 168 kg. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters for the Ninja 650 2017 and 14 liters for the Ninja 400 2023.

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

In terms of strengths, the Ninja 650 2017 is praised for its transparent chassis for sport, playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks reminiscent of the ZX-10R, and a resilient engine. On the other hand, the Ninja 400 2023 is commended for its good combination of stability and playful handling, robust and reliable appearance, well-controllable engine, wide usable rev range, and pleasant seating position.

However, there are also weaknesses associated with each model. The Ninja 650 2017 is criticized for having little sound from the stock exhaust and slight vibrations from the engine. On the other hand, the Ninja 400 2023 has limited space for larger riders.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023 are both capable sporty motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja 650 2017 offers a more powerful engine and slightly larger dimensions, while the Ninja 400 2023 provides a more compact and nimble riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 compared to Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore70 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke51.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power45 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque37 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore32 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement399 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake63 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail92 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength1,990 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth710 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)168 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.

Transparent chassis for sport

playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R

resilient engine.

Little sound from the series pot

engine shows slight vibrations

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023

The Ninja 400 offers a lot of riding fun at a manageable price. It offers playful handling without being nervous. The name "Ninja" is a bit of a mouthful, but the range of use is wider than you might think. It rides sportily, but also offers a good riding position for everyday use and touring.

Good combination of stability and playful handling

Robust and reliable appearance

Well controllable engine

Wide usable rev range

Pleasant seating position

Limited space for large pilots

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and a Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 is about 4% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Ninja 400 2023 there are less Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 73. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja 650 with 96 days compared to 165 days for a Kawasaki Ninja 400. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 9 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 400 since model year 2018. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 44,300 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja 400 published on 11/22/2017.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Ninja 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG