Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2012
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
KTM 690 Duke 2012
Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs KTM 690 Duke 2012
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the KTM 690 Duke 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine capacities and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a significantly higher output with 106 HP compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2012's 70 HP. This means that the Triumph offers more power and acceleration, making it a more thrilling ride. The torque is also higher on the Triumph with 68 Nm compared to the KTM's 70 Nm.
The number of cylinders is another point of difference between the two bikes. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has three cylinders, while the KTM 690 Duke 2012 has only one. This difference in cylinder configuration can affect the smoothness and power delivery of the engine. The Triumph's three-cylinder engine provides a smoother and more refined performance compared to the KTM's single-cylinder engine.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, but they are from different brands. The Triumph uses Kayaba forks, while the KTM uses WP forks. The choice of suspension brand can impact the handling and comfort of the bike, but without further information, it is difficult to determine which brand performs better.
In terms of braking, both bikes have four-piston front calipers with radial technology. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 uses Nissin brakes, while the KTM 690 Duke 2012 uses Brembo brakes. Brembo is known for its high-performance braking systems, so the KTM may offer slightly better braking performance.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have similar front tire widths and diameters. However, the Triumph has a wider rear tire at 180 mm compared to the KTM's 160 mm. The wheelbase of the KTM is slightly longer at 1466 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height is also higher on the KTM at 835 mm compared to the Triumph's 800 mm. The fuel tank capacity is higher on the Triumph at 17.4 liters compared to the KTM's 14 liters.
KTM 690 Duke 2012
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is praised for its taut and playful chassis, agility, low weight, powerful brakes, and comfort. On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2012 is praised for its extremely fast yet smooth performance, precise and manageable chassis, and high agility.
In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph's brake application is described as a little brute towards the end, suggesting that it may require more finesse to achieve smooth braking. The KTM's weakness is that it takes some getting used to when driving bends in the road, indicating that it may not handle corners as easily as the Triumph.
Overall, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 offers more power and a smoother engine performance, while the KTM 690 Duke 2012 excels in terms of speed and agility. The choice between the two models ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2012
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.
KTM 690 Duke 2012
More than a decade after its launch, the KTM 690 Duke remains a fascinating bike with its own character. The attempt to turn the rebellious Duke into a bike with more mass appeal has proven to be a successful strategy. The combination of an outstanding LC4 engine, direct handling and good value for money continues to make it an attractive option for riders looking for something special. Although newer twin-cylinder models are superior in terms of smooth running and comfort, the 690 Duke offers an immediacy and character that only a large single-cylinder can deliver. As a used motorbike, it has proven to be surprisingly stable in value and durable - provided you pay attention to regular maintenance.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs KTM 690 Duke
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and a KTM 690 Duke 2012. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 50 days compared to 52 days for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke since model year 2008. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 14,800 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke published on 9/28/2007.
