Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer powerful engines and sporty performance. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 takes the lead with its 160 HP, compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 135 HP. This extra power translates into a more exhilarating and thrilling riding experience on the BMW. Additionally, the BMW has a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Triumph's 111 Nm.

Both bikes feature an in-line engine type and a four-piston radial front brake system, which ensures excellent stopping power. They also share similar dimensions and weights, with a front tire width of 120 mm, a rear tire width of 190 mm, and a wheelbase of around 1435-1439 mm. The fuel tank capacity is also the same at 17.5 liters.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front, providing a smooth and controlled ride. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's suspension, however, has been criticized for being slightly uncomfortable, particularly the Showa elements. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014's suspension has been praised for its sporty chassis and excellent electronic helpers.

Both bikes have aluminum frames with a twin-tube design, ensuring stability and rigidity. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has an upright seating position, which is comfortable for longer rides, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly lower seat height, making it more accessible for riders with shorter legs.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

One area where the BMW S 1000 R 2014 outshines the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is in its electronic features. The BMW comes equipped with advanced electronic aids such as traction control, ABS, and different riding modes, enhancing the overall safety and performance of the bike. The Triumph, on the other hand, lacks these electronic features.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has been criticized for its slightly stubborn handling and uncomfortable Showa suspension elements. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has been noted for its slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be ideal for shorter riders. Additionally, the design of the BMW is subjective and may not appeal to everyone.

Overall, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 offers a powerful three-cylinder engine and a sporty driving feel, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 provides extreme power and performance, along with advanced electronic aids. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 24% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH