Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer impressive performance and advanced features.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with an in-line 3-cylinder engine that delivers 123 horsepower and 77 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 features an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces a higher power output of 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of raw power and performance.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame design. This ensures a lightweight and agile ride for both motorcycles.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

When it comes to braking, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial monoblock technology. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 also has double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology. Both bikes offer excellent braking performance, ensuring safety and control.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 comes with ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 features dynamic suspension as its advanced rider assistance system. Both bikes offer electronic aids that enhance the riding experience and provide added safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120 mm and front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Triumph's 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is also slightly longer at 1439 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height of the BMW is slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity, with the BMW having a slightly larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Triumph's 17.4 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control that can be switched off. It also has a cool look and a low weight, which contributes to its agile handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, and a terrific price/performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a complicated menu navigation, which may be a drawback for some riders. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. Additionally, the design of the BMW is subjective and may be a matter of taste.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a sporty engine and excellent braking system, while the BMW provides extreme power and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
BMW S 1000 R 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke53.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power123 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,800 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.65 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement765 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,065 mmLength2,057 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 16% higher. A Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 experiences a loss of 20 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 590 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS was published on 1/10/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen