Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. Honda CB650R 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs Honda CB650R 2021

The Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Honda CB650R 2021 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. While they share some similarities in terms of engine type, cooling system, and suspension, there are notable differences in their specifications and performance.

Starting with the engine, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 boasts a more powerful engine with 125.4 HP compared to the Honda CB650R 2021's 95 HP. This gives the Z900 an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Additionally, the Z900 has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm, providing better low-end power and responsiveness.

In terms of fuel system, both bikes feature fuel injection, ensuring efficient fuel delivery and improved throttle response. They also have four cylinders and liquid cooling systems, which help maintain optimal engine temperature during long rides.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Z900 offers the additional feature of adjustable preload and rebound on the rear shock absorber, allowing riders to fine-tune their suspension settings for a personalized riding experience. The CB650R, on the other hand, only offers preload adjustment.

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In terms of chassis, both bikes have steel frames, but the Z900 has a double cradle frame, while the CB650R features a twin-tube frame. The choice of frame design can affect the bike's handling and stability, with the double cradle frame providing a stiffer and more rigid structure.

Braking performance is another important aspect to consider. Both bikes feature double disk brakes at the front with four-piston calipers, ensuring reliable stopping power. However, the CB650R has larger front brake disks with a diameter of 310 mm, compared to the Z900's 300 mm disks. The CB650R also has radial brake technology, which enhances braking performance and provides a more precise feel.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes are equipped with ABS, which enhances safety by preventing wheel lock-up during braking. This feature is particularly beneficial in emergency situations or on slippery surfaces.

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also share the same wheelbase of 1450 mm. However, there are differences in seat height and kerb weight. The CB650R has a higher seat height of 810 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm, which may make it less suitable for taller riders. In terms of weight, the CB650R is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 202.5 kg, while the Z900 weighs 210 kg with ABS.

In terms of strengths, the Z900 stands out for its powerful and smooth engine, great sound, sharp and sporty look, low seating position, and easy handling. On the other hand, the CB650R is praised for its Neo Sports Cafe Optics, beginner-friendly nature, good price-performance ratio, smooth engine revs, and low fuel consumption.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Z900 lacks traction control, which could be a disadvantage in certain riding conditions. Additionally, tall riders may find the knee angle on the Z900 strenuous during long rides. The CB650R, on the other hand, has limited space for taller riders, mediocre equipment, a relatively bulky design, and a lack of punch in the lower rev range.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Honda CB650R 2021 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a more powerful engine and adjustable rear suspension, while the CB650R is more beginner-friendly and fuel-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to Honda CB650R 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2018
Honda CB650R 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.6
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake64.5 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail101 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter240 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,120 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth750 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)202.5 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In the hotly contested naked bike segment, the Z900 plays right at the front. Above all, its engine is absolutely terrific, runs incredibly silky and offers rich power in all rev regions - as befits a Japanese four-cylinder. Its sporty, aggressive appearance matches this. It does without electronic bells and whistles, but still conveys a lot of confidence when chasing corners, braking and accelerating out of them. The low seat is especially beneficial for smaller riders, but taller riders might miss a flatter knee angle on long distances. The low weight and compactness make the Z900 particularly agile and easy to handle. A sporting cannon that is also extremely appealing in terms of price

Powerful and silky engine

great sound

chassis

sharp, sporty look

low seating position

easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Lack of traction control

Knee angle strenuous for tall riders in the long run

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

13 out of a possible 24 points mean 5th place in the large mid-range naked bike comparison test 2021. The Honda puts up a good fight against the technically more advanced competition and can leave a motorbike behind despite its position as an outsider. Pleasing looks, accessible riding and the low price make the shortcomings that were brought to light in the direct comparison fade into the background.

Neo Sports Cafe Optics still top

absolutely suitable for beginners

good price-performance ratio

engine revs up smoothly

low consumption

Too little space for tall riders

mediocre equipment

relatively chubby

little punch from the rev range

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Honda CB650R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a Honda CB650R 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2018 is about 31% higher. Compared to Honda CB650R 2021 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 55 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB650R with 63 days compared to 112 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 23 reviews for the Honda CB650R since model year 2019. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 53,700 views for the first review on Honda CB650R published on 10/8/2018.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CB650R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG