Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2013 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS model year 2017 are both naked bikes from Triumph, but they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both bikes have an inline three-cylinder engine, but the Speed Triple 1050 has a higher engine power of 135 HP compared to the Street Triple 765 RS's 123 HP. The Speed Triple also has higher torque at 111 Nm, while the Street Triple has 77 Nm of torque. In terms of displacement, the Speed Triple has a larger engine at 1050 ccm, while the Street Triple has a smaller engine at 765 ccm.

Both bikes have liquid cooling and a twin tube aluminum frame, providing stability and durability. The suspension on the Speed Triple is provided by Showa, with compression and rebound adjustment for both the front and rear suspension. The Street Triple, on the other hand, has Showa front suspension with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment, and Öhlins rear suspension with the same adjustment options. This gives the Street Triple more versatility and customization options for different riding preferences.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

In terms of braking, both bikes have four-piston Brembo front brakes with radial technology. However, the Street Triple RS has the added advantage of monoblock technology, providing even better braking performance. This makes the Street Triple RS's braking system superior to that of the Speed Triple.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Speed Triple has a wider rear tire at 190 mm compared to the Street Triple RS's 180 mm. The Speed Triple also has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1435 mm, while the Street Triple RS has a wheelbase of 1410 mm. Both bikes have a seat height of 825 mm and a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 has a powerful three-cylinder engine, providing a sporty driving feel. Its upright seating position and stable frame contribute to a comfortable and confident riding experience. On the other hand, the Street Triple 765 RS has a wonderfully sporty engine with a quickshifter as standard, allowing for seamless gear changes. It also has a throaty sound, excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control as standard, which can be switched off for more advanced riders. Additionally, the Street Triple RS has a cool and stylish appearance and is relatively lightweight.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Speed Triple's Showa suspension elements are slightly uncomfortable, and it has a reputation for having stubborn handling. On the other hand, the Street Triple RS has a complicated menu navigation system, which may be frustrating for some riders.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple offers a powerful engine and a stable frame, while the Street Triple RS provides a sporty engine, excellent braking system, and advanced features like ABS and traction control. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power123 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque10,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.65
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
BrandBrandNissinBrandBrembo

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is about 7% higher. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 there are more Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 67 days for a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG