KTM 350 EXC-F 2012 vs. KTM Freeride 350 2012
KTM 350 EXC-F 2012
KTM Freeride 350 2012
Overview - KTM 350 EXC-F 2012 vs KTM Freeride 350 2012
The KTM 350 EXC-F and the KTM Freeride 350, both from the 2012 model year, are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They share the same bore and stroke measurements of 88mm and 57.5mm, respectively. They also have electric starters and a single cylinder engine with a displacement of 349.7cc.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and WP suspension at the rear. This ensures good handling and stability on various terrains. The front suspension brand is also the same for both models.
However, there are some differences between the two bikes. The KTM 350 EXC-F has a central tube frame type, while the KTM Freeride 350 has a perimeter frame type. This means that the EXC-F may offer better stability and rigidity, while the Freeride 350 may have a more nimble and responsive feel.
KTM 350 EXC-F 2012
The dimensions and weights of the two bikes also differ slightly. The EXC-F has a longer wheelbase of 1482mm compared to the Freeride 350's 1418mm. The seat height of the EXC-F is higher at 970mm, while the Freeride 350 has a lower seat height of 895mm. The dry weight of the EXC-F is slightly higher at 107.5kg, while the Freeride 350 weighs 99.5kg.
In terms of tire specifications, both bikes have a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. However, the EXC-F has a wider rear tire width of 140mm, while the Freeride 350 has a narrower rear tire width of 110mm.
Another difference between the two bikes is the fuel tank capacity. The EXC-F has a larger fuel tank capacity of 9.5 liters, while the Freeride 350 has a smaller capacity of 5.5 liters. This means that the EXC-F may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
KTM Freeride 350 2012
In terms of strengths, the KTM 350 EXC-F has a more refined look with thinner walls and a new practical fuel filter. On the other hand, the KTM Freeride 350 has a high-strength frame deck, a positive chassis, and a lower seating position, which conveys a sense of safety.
However, there are also weaknesses for each bike. The EXC-F has a slightly increased weight compared to the Freeride 350. On the other hand, the Freeride 350 may be disadvantaged compared to the EXC-F in full-throttle passages and higher jumps.
Overall, both the KTM 350 EXC-F and the KTM Freeride 350 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.
Technical Specifications KTM 350 EXC-F 2012 compared to KTM Freeride 350 2012
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
KTM 350 EXC-F 2012
The 350 is simply the new golden mean. In tough terrain on uphill sections, it is strong enough to compensate for a lack of riding skills with the throttle grip. But not too strong that it throws you off like a rodeo ox if you use it too hard. Downhill, it's light enough that you won't leave skid marks in your enduro underwear, even on rocky passages.
KTM Freeride 350 2012
The Freeride doesn't try to combine trials and enduro to be the champion of its class in both genres. It would simply be too heavy as a trial and probably too fragile in the long run as a competition enduro. The Freeride will certainly be well received by smaller riders, as the low seat height opens up enduro riding to more people.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 350 EXC-F vs KTM Freeride 350
There are a few key differences between a KTM 350 EXC-F 2012 and a KTM Freeride 350 2012. It takes less time to sell a KTM 350 EXC-F with 46 days compared to 62 days for a KTM Freeride 350. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the KTM 350 EXC-F and 5 reviews for the KTM Freeride 350 since model year 2012. The first review for the KTM 350 EXC-F was published on 11/2/2010 and now has more than 10,800 views. This compares to more than 19,900 views for the first review on KTM Freeride 350 published on 11/8/2011.
