Kawasaki Z 300 2015 vs. BMW G 310 R 2017

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 300 2015 vs BMW G 310 R 2017

The Kawasaki Z 300 2015 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 comes out on top with 39 HP, compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 34 HP. This means that the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 may offer a slightly more powerful and exhilarating ride. However, the BMW G 310 R 2017 compensates for this with its slightly higher torque of 28 Nm, compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2015's 27 Nm.

Another notable difference between the two bikes is the number of cylinders. The Kawasaki Z 300 2015 has a 2-cylinder engine, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 has a single-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration may result in variations in performance and sound. The Kawasaki Z 300 2015 is known for its high-revving engine, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 offers a smooth response and a throaty sound.

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature a steel frame, which provides stability and durability. The Kawasaki Z 300 2015 has favorable chassis components, which contribute to its overall performance. On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2017 has individual components that may appear cheap, potentially affecting the bike's overall quality.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1405 mm, compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 1374 mm. Both bikes have the same front tire width of 110 mm and front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW G 310 R 2017 has a wider rear tire of 150 mm, compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2015's 140 mm. In terms of weight, the BMW G 310 R 2017 is lighter with a kerb weight of 158.5 kg, while the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 weighs 170 kg (both weights include ABS).

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Both bikes have a comfortable seating position, with a seat height of 785 mm. This allows riders of various heights to feel at ease while riding. Additionally, both bikes have a liquid cooling system, which helps to maintain optimal engine temperature.

When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 has a larger capacity of 17 liters, compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 11 liters. This means that the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 may offer a longer riding range before needing to refuel.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z 300 2015 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki Z 300 2015 offers a higher engine power and a high-quality finish, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 boasts a smooth response and a lower seat height. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's personal preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 300 2015 compared to BMW G 310 R 2017

Kawasaki Z 300 2015
BMW G 310 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore62 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49 mmStroke62 mm
Engine powerEngine power39 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque27 NmTorque28 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio10.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement296 ccmDisplacement313 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,015 mmLength1,988 mm
WidthWidth750 mmWidth896 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,374 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)170 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

Kawasaki Z 300 2015

The cool design of the Kawasaki Z300, which is extremely similar to that of its big sister Z800, makes it a very grown-up-looking motorbike. The stable braking system and the easy-to-read cockpit with an analogue rev counter and all the necessary features fit in very well with this image. Thanks to the 170 kg ready-to-ride weight, the bike is extremely easy to handle and playful. The engine only reveals its potential in the upper rev range, but revs up willingly and makes you want to ride in a sporty manner. Only the comfort-oriented chassis cannot quite cope with radically sporty demands - but this is quite legitimate and understandable for an entry-level motorbike.

Adult look

high-quality finish

high-revving engine

comfortable seating position

stable brake

easy-to-read, complete cockpit

low fuel consumption.

Very unobtrusive sound

favourable chassis components

engine only starts when idling

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

The BMW G 310 R scores with easy handling that should not overtax any beginner. The great responsiveness of the single cylinder makes it easy to control, and the low seat height gives a secure footing at traffic lights. For reasons of cost, savings were made in some corners, which unfortunately also becomes visible. In comparison, the workmanship is not on a par with the competition.

Smooth response

low seat height

pretty design

throaty sound

Individual components look cheap

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 300 vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z 300 2015 and a BMW G 310 R 2017. It takes less time to sell a BMW G 310 R with 75 days compared to 111 days for the Kawasaki Z 300. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 300 and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the Kawasaki Z 300 was published on 11/4/2014 and now has more than 59,800 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Price Kawasaki Z 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG