Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017 vs. Yamaha R125 2008
Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017
Yamaha R125 2008
Overview - Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017 vs Yamaha R125 2008
The Suzuki GSX-R 125 model year 2017 and the Yamaha YZF-R125 model year 2008 are both popular supersport motorcycles in their respective years. While they have some similarities in terms of engine power, number of cylinders, and displacement, there are also notable differences in their dimensions, weights, and other features.
Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have a single-cylinder engine with a power output of 15 horsepower. The Suzuki GSX-R 125 has a displacement of 124cc, while the Yamaha YZF-R125 has a slightly larger displacement of 125cc. In terms of dimensions, the Suzuki has a wheelbase of 1300mm, while the Yamaha has a longer wheelbase of 1353mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is 785mm, whereas the Yamaha has a higher seat height of 818mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Suzuki is 11 liters, while the Yamaha has a larger fuel tank capacity of 13.8 liters.
Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017
In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-R 125 has a low weight, which contributes to its strong acceleration despite its 15 horsepower engine. It is capable of reaching a top speed of 125 km/h and is even wheelie capable. The motorcycle is equipped with LED headlights, which provide better visibility, and it has an informative display that provides essential information to the rider.
On the other hand, the Yamaha YZF-R125 has a very low overall weight, which enhances its maneuverability and makes it easier to handle. It is praised for its comfort, great workmanship, and stability. The clutch is described as buttery smooth, and the chassis is considered optimal for performance. The Yamaha is known for its easy handling, making it a popular choice among riders.
Yamaha R125 2008
However, the Suzuki GSX-R 125 does have some weaknesses. The brakes could be stronger, and some riders desire more front wheel feel for better control. On the other hand, the Yamaha YZF-R125 has a relatively low power-to-weight ratio, which may not satisfy riders looking for more power. Additionally, it is not suitable for riders who prefer a more relaxed approach to shifting gears.
In conclusion, the Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017 and the Yamaha YZF-R125 2008 are both competitive supersport motorcycles in their respective years. While the Suzuki offers a low weight, strong acceleration, and modern features like LED headlights, the Yamaha stands out for its comfort, workmanship, and easy handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017 compared to Yamaha R125 2008
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017
Maybe not in comparison with its big sisters, but in this class the GSX-R125 still passes for a real super sports bike. With a power output of 15 hp and a 6-speed gearbox, the Gixxer accelerates briskly towards the horizon, up to 125 km/h, thanks to its low weight of 134 kg. The lowest weight in the class also has a positive effect on the riding dynamics; the GSX-R125 can be thrown playfully from bend to bend. Only when the going gets really fast do you wish you had more feeling for the front wheel and better brakes.
Yamaha R125 2008
In any case, with the YZF-125R, Yamaha offers real supersport feeling in the 125cc sector and sets new standards in terms of build quality and technical equipment.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-R 125 vs Yamaha R125
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 125 2017 and a Yamaha YZF-R125 2008. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha YZF-R125 with 42 days compared to 167 days for the Suzuki GSX-R 125. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 125 and 19 reviews for the Yamaha YZF-R125 since model year 2008. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 125 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 50,400 views. This compares to more than 24,200 views for the first review on Yamaha YZF-R125 published on 9/12/2007.
