Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 are both naked bikes with similar wheelbase measurements and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 boasts 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007's 98 HP. This makes the XSR900 more powerful and potentially more thrilling to ride. Additionally, the XSR900 has a three-cylinder engine, while the FZ6-N S2 has a four-cylinder engine. The XSR900's larger displacement of 847 ccm also contributes to its increased power.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Both bikes have similar dimensions and weights, with a wheelbase of 1440 mm. However, there are slight differences in seat height and fuel tank capacity. The XSR900 has a seat height of 815 mm, while the FZ6-N S2 has a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The FZ6-N S2 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19.4 liters, compared to the XSR900's 14 liters.
In terms of strengths, the XSR900 stands out for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and standard ABS and TC features. It also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship. On the other hand, the FZ6-N S2 is praised for its beautiful appearance, one-piece cast brake calipers, high-quality anodized dip tubes, FZ1 cockpits, brakes, and optimum seating position.
However, there are some weaknesses to consider as well. The XSR900 has a hard chassis, which may affect the overall comfort of the ride. The seat could also be more comfortable, which may be a drawback for longer rides. Additionally, the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already present on many other Yamaha models, which may make it less unique.
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
In comparison, the FZ6-N S2 has a surcharge to standard, which may make it less accessible to some buyers. Additionally, the engine of the FZ6-N S2 is weaker in the lower rev range, which may affect its overall performance.
Overall, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a more powerful engine and modern features, while the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 has a beautiful appearance and unique design elements. The choice between the two models ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha XSR900 2016
The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
So the Yamaha FZ6-N Spec II certainly lives up to its looks in terms of performance. A very rideable motorbike on which experienced riders should nevertheless not get bored.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha FZ6-N S2
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 with 59 days compared to 77 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 6 reviews for the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 since model year 2007. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 31,700 views for the first review on Yamaha FZ6-N S2 published on 10/13/2006.
