KTM 790 Duke 2020 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2013
KTM 790 Duke 2020
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Overview - KTM 790 Duke 2020 vs KTM 690 Duke 2013
The KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and capabilities. Starting with the KTM 790 Duke 2020, it boasts a powerful engine with 105 HP and a displacement of 799ccm. This two-cylinder engine provides a high-revving performance, allowing for exhilarating rides. In comparison, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a single-cylinder engine with 68 HP and a displacement of 690ccm. While it may not have as much power as the 790 Duke, it still offers sufficient power for most riders.
Both models feature liquid cooling, ensuring optimal engine temperature regulation. This is crucial for maintaining performance and preventing overheating during long rides. Additionally, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, providing excellent stability and control. The front suspension on both models is branded by WP, a reputable manufacturer known for producing high-quality suspension systems.
In terms of chassis, both the KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 feature a chromium-molybdenum frame. This type of frame is known for its strength and durability, providing a solid foundation for the bikes. However, it is worth noting that the 790 Duke offers chassis adjustment options, allowing riders to fine-tune the bike's handling to their preferences. The 690 Duke, on the other hand, does not offer this capability, potentially limiting customization options.
KTM 790 Duke 2020
When it comes to braking, both models have four-piston front brakes with radial technology. This brake setup ensures powerful and responsive stopping power, enhancing safety and control on the road. Additionally, both bikes offer advanced rider assistance systems. The KTM 790 Duke 2020 comes equipped with ABS, riding modes, and traction control, providing additional safety features for riders. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 features ride-by-wire technology, which enhances throttle response and control.
In terms of dimensions and weights, there are minimal differences between the two models. Both have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The KTM 790 Duke 2020 has a slightly wider rear tire with a width of 180mm, compared to the 160mm width of the KTM 690 Duke 2013. Both bikes have a wheelbase of around 1470mm, providing stability and agility on the road. The seat height of the 790 Duke is slightly lower at 825mm, while the 690 Duke has a seat height of 835mm. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, allowing for decent range during rides.
In terms of strengths, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 offers a quickshifter as standard, allowing for seamless gear changes. It also has a great chassis set-up and playful handling, making it a joy to ride. The high-quality electronics package, including ABS, riding modes, and traction control, adds to the overall safety and performance of the bike. Additionally, the TFT display provides clear and detailed information to the rider. Lastly, the 790 Duke offers a good price/performance ratio, making it an attractive option for riders.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, making it agile and easy to maneuver. It also has sufficient power for most riders and boasts low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for daily commuting or long rides.
In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 has the limitation of having the suspension spring preload adjustable at the rear only. This may limit the customization options for riders who prefer to fine-tune their suspension settings. The KTM 690 Duke 2013, on the other hand, does not offer any chassis adjustment options, potentially limiting the comfort and customization for riders.
In conclusion, both the KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 have their unique strengths and weaknesses. The 790 Duke offers a more powerful engine, advanced rider assistance systems, and chassis adjustment options. On the other hand, the 690 Duke is lightweight, fuel-efficient, and offers sufficient power for most riders. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.
Technical Specifications KTM 790 Duke 2020 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2013
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
KTM 790 Duke 2020
A sporty naked bike that not only has enough power, but also playful handling and high-quality equipment - the KTM 790 Duke ticks all the boxes. If the looks don't bother you, it's hard to find anything the 790 can't do well, because in its hunting ground - the country road - it forms a wonderfully rounded package that doesn't really leave anything to be desired. Initial teething troubles have also been solved, which is why the KTM 790 Duke is still a real recommendation!
KTM 690 Duke 2013
For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 790 Duke vs KTM 690 Duke
There are a few key differences between a KTM 790 Duke 2020 and a KTM 690 Duke 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 790 Duke 2020 is about 55% higher. A KTM 790 Duke 2020 experiences a loss of 120 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 200 USD for a KTM 690 Duke 2013. Compared to KTM 690 Duke 2013 there are more KTM 790 Duke 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 25 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 78 days for the KTM 790 Duke. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 35 reviews for the KTM 790 Duke and 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke since model year 2008. The first review for the KTM 790 Duke was published on 11/9/2016 and now has more than 160,600 views. This compares to more than 14,800 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke published on 9/28/2007.
