Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 is more powerful with 125.4 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 which has 114 HP. The Z900 also has higher torque at 98.6 Nm compared to the GSX-S750's 81 Nm. This means that the Z900 will offer more acceleration and power on the road.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient fuel delivery and optimal engine temperature. The Z900 has a larger displacement at 948ccm compared to the GSX-S750's 749ccm, which contributes to its higher power output.

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Z900 has a monoshock rear suspension with preload and rebound adjustment, while the GSX-S750 only has preload adjustment. The Z900 also has an aluminum rear suspension, which may offer better performance and weight reduction compared to the steel rear suspension of the GSX-S750.

In terms of chassis, the Z900 has a steel double cradle frame, while the GSX-S750 has an aluminum twin tube frame. Both frames offer stability and rigidity, but the choice between steel and aluminum may impact the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but there are some differences in the specifications. The Z900 has four-piston calipers and 300mm diameter disks, while the GSX-S750 has double-piston calipers and slightly larger 310mm diameter disks. Both bikes are equipped with ABS for advanced rider assistance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The Z900 has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1450mm compared to the GSX-S750's 1455mm. The seat height of the Z900 is lower at 795mm compared to the GSX-S750's 820mm, which may make it more accessible for shorter riders.

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

In terms of strengths, the Z900 has a powerful and smooth engine, great sound, and a sharp, sporty look. It also has a low seating position, making it easy to handle and maneuver. On the other hand, the GSX-S750 has a strong character engine derived from the GSX-R 750, powerful and well-controlled brakes, and a harmonious design. It also offers a great lean angle clearance and an affordable price.

In terms of weaknesses, the Z900 lacks traction control, which may be a disadvantage for riders looking for advanced safety features. Additionally, the knee angle on the Z900 may be strenuous for tall riders during long rides. The GSX-S750 also has an acute knee angle and a tachometer that may be difficult to read.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a more powerful engine and a lower seating position, while the GSX-S750 has a strong character engine and an affordable price. Riders should consider their priorities and preferences when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2018
Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power114 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque81 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.3
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement749 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel138 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialSteel

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake64.7 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail104 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,125 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth785 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,455 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height820 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In the hotly contested naked bike segment, the Z900 plays right at the front. Above all, its engine is absolutely terrific, runs incredibly silky and offers rich power in all rev regions - as befits a Japanese four-cylinder. Its sporty, aggressive appearance matches this. It does without electronic bells and whistles, but still conveys a lot of confidence when chasing corners, braking and accelerating out of them. The low seat is especially beneficial for smaller riders, but taller riders might miss a flatter knee angle on long distances. The low weight and compactness make the Z900 particularly agile and easy to handle. A sporting cannon that is also extremely appealing in terms of price

Powerful and silky engine

great sound

chassis

sharp, sporty look

low seating position

easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Lack of traction control

Knee angle strenuous for tall riders in the long run

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

More power, more performance, more sound. Suzuki also proves all the pessimists regarding the EURO4 standard wrong and delivers the GSX-S 750, a successor to the GSR 750 that has been further developed in every respect and can be a bit more serious, but doesn't have to be. To ensure that aha moments don't become oje moments, ABS and a three-stage traction control that can be switched off provide a safety cushion. With S21 tyres from Bridgestone, the GSX-S is super-sporty, allowing you to take advantage of the generous lean angle clearance. Only the acute knee angle could be a disadvantage on longer tours.

GSX-R 750 engine with strong character

powerful, well-controlled brakes

harmonious design

affordable price

sharp sound

great lean angle clearance

acute knee angle

tachometer difficult to read

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Suzuki GSX-S750

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a Suzuki GSX-S750 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2018 is about 20% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 55 compared to 14. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S750 with 84 days compared to 112 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 14 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S750 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 50,800 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S750 published on 10/4/2016.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG