Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline 4-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a clear advantage with 160 horsepower compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 125.4 horsepower. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the Yamaha has more power and acceleration capabilities.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient and reliable performance. The Yamaha has a slightly larger displacement of 998cc compared to the Kawasaki's 948cc.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension. The Kawasaki Z900 only offers preload and rebound adjustments.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

The chassis of the Yamaha MT-10 SP is made of aluminum and has a Deltabox frame, which is known for its rigidity and lightweight construction. The Kawasaki Z900, on the other hand, has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The aluminum frame of the Yamaha contributes to its overall lighter weight and better handling.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but the Yamaha MT-10 SP has larger diameter disks at 320mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 300mm disks. This allows for better braking performance and control.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a more comprehensive package. It includes ABS, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The Kawasaki Z900 only has ABS.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120mm and diameter of 17 inches. However, the Yamaha has a wider rear tire at 190mm compared to the Kawasaki's 180mm. The Yamaha also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1450mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is higher at 825mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795mm. Both bikes have the same kerb weight of 210kg with ABS.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a responsive engine with well-balanced torque. It is also considered to be a good value for its performance and practicality.

The Yamaha MT-10 SP is praised for its great chassis, high ride comfort, and electronic chassis that enhances utility comfort. The engine is described as emotional yet refined, and the bike offers pleasant wind protection. Despite its radical looks and aggressive sound, the Yamaha is considered a balanced overall package.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 is criticized for its narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. The Yamaha MT-10 SP is noted to have traction control that is not as advanced as the Aprilia, and the seating position is described as too inactive on the racetrack.

Overall, the Yamaha MT-10 SP offers more power, advanced rider assistance systems, and adjustability in suspension compared to the Kawasaki Z900. However, the Kawasaki Z900 is praised for its chassis and overall value for money.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel140 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDeltabox
RakeRake65 degreeRake66 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail102 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

With the SP version, the MT-10 becomes cooler, more desirable and, thanks to the high-quality chassis, better. The semi-active suspension from the R1M is the best in the naked bike league. Highest quality and best function in combination. The chassis also excites on the racetrack. Nevertheless, the MT-10SP is not a racing machine, because the seating position is not active enough for that.

great chassis

high ride comfort / utility comfort due to the electronic chassis

very emotional but nevertheless cultivated engine

pleasant wind protection

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Traction control not up to the level of the Aprilia

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2017 and a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is about 44% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2017 experiences a loss of 520 USD in one year and 920 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 2,320 USD and 1,580 USD for a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 43 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 85 days compared to 123 days for a Yamaha MT-10 SP. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 18 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 SP since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 28,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 SP published on 10/4/2016.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH