BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 vs. BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 vs BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

The BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014 are both enduro motorcycles designed for off-road adventures. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 is equipped with a 798cc engine that delivers 86 horsepower and 83 Nm of torque. It has a chain transmission and features a 2-cylinder configuration. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014 boasts a larger 1170cc engine that produces 125 horsepower and 125 Nm of torque. It has a prop shaft transmission and also features a 2-cylinder configuration. In terms of power, the R 1200 GS Adventure has a clear advantage with its higher horsepower and torque figures.

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

Moving on to the suspension, the BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm suspension in the rear. The BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014, on the other hand, features a strut front suspension and a single swing arm suspension in the rear. Both bikes have steel frames, with the F 800 GS Adventure having a tubular load-bearing engine frame and the R 1200 GS Adventure having a twin tube load-bearing engine frame. While the suspension setups may differ, both bikes offer a stable and comfortable ride off-road.

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes in the front. The F 800 GS Adventure 2013 does not have any specific information regarding its braking system, while the R 1200 GS Adventure 2014 is praised for its strong and reliable brakes. This indicates that the R 1200 GS Adventure may have an advantage in terms of braking performance.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the F 800 GS Adventure 2013 has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 150 mm, and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1578 mm and a seat height of 890 mm. The bike weighs 229 kg (with ABS) and has a fuel tank capacity of 24 liters. On the other hand, the R 1200 GS Adventure 2014 has a slightly smaller front tire diameter of 19 inches, a wider rear tire width of 170 mm, and the same rear tire diameter of 17 inches. It has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1510 mm and a higher seat height of 910 mm. The bike weighs 260 kg (with ABS) and has a larger fuel tank capacity of 30 liters. Overall, the R 1200 GS Adventure is slightly larger and heavier than the F 800 GS Adventure, which may affect its maneuverability off-road.

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

In terms of strengths, the F 800 GS Adventure 2013 is praised for its torque-strong engine, low weight, and 24-liter fuel tank. The R 1200 GS Adventure 2014, on the other hand, is known for being easy to ride, having a larger 33-liter fuel tank, comfortable ergonomics, and strong brakes. Both bikes do not have any specific weaknesses mentioned, indicating that they are well-rounded in terms of performance and features.

In conclusion, the BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and advantages. The F 800 GS Adventure offers a torque-strong engine and a lighter weight, while the R 1200 GS Adventure provides easy handling, a larger fuel tank, comfortable ergonomics, and strong brakes. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 compared to BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013
BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power86 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque83 NmTorque125 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,750 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeToughened, Dry
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionStrut

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustableAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRiding modes

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width170 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,305 mmLength2,255 mm
WidthWidth890 mmWidth980 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,578 mmWheelbase1,510 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height910 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)229 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)260 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity24 lFuel Tank Capacity30 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013

The big R 1200 GS Adventure may have been the ultimate long-distance adventure bike up to now, but anyone who also values a bit of fun and sport is certainly better served by the F 800 GS Adventure.

Torque-strong engine

low weight

24-litre tank

Nix

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014

In the last 30 years of its development, the GS has learned everything you need to know to remain the best-selling motorbike over 500 cubic metres for years - worldwide!

easy to ride

33-litre tank

ergonomics

brakes

Nix

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 GS Adventure vs BMW R 1200 GS Adventure

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 GS Adventure 2013 and a BMW R 1200 GS Adventure 2014. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 GS Adventure with 64 days compared to 68 days for the BMW F 800 GS Adventure. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the BMW F 800 GS Adventure and 35 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS Adventure since model year 2006. The first review for the BMW F 800 GS Adventure was published on 6/24/2013 and now has more than 39,600 views. This compares to more than 12,900 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS Adventure published on 11/28/2005.

Price BMW F 800 GS Adventure

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1200 GS Adventure

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG