Husqvarna TE 250R 2013 vs. KTM 250 EXC 2010

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Overview - Husqvarna TE 250R 2013 vs KTM 250 EXC 2010

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250R 2013 compared to KTM 250 EXC 2010

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	79 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Stroke	Stroke	50.9 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	5
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	249.5 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	WP

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	120 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	90 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,470 mm	Wheelbase	1,475 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	950 mm	Seat Height	985 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	109 kg	Dry Weight	100.8 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 250 EXC 2010

Even if the changes to the EXCs this year are limited, when it comes to Enduro, KTM is still the benchmark to measure itself against. Especially in the 2-stroke sector, there is still a lot of development going on.

Improved design

convincing gearbox

optimal gears

acceptable performance.

Chassis could be made a little more sophisticated.