BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs. BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs BMW R 1250 R 2019

The BMW S 1000 R 2017 and the BMW R 1250 R 2019 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 is equipped with an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces 165 horsepower and 114 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 R 2019 features a boxer 2-cylinder engine that delivers 136 horsepower and 143 Nm of torque. While the S 1000 R has a higher power output, the R 1250 R offers a slightly higher torque.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and monoshock absorbers at the rear. However, the S 1000 R has a swing arm suspension, while the R 1250 R has a single swing arm suspension. The chassis of the S 1000 R is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame, while the R 1250 R has a steel frame with a load-bearing engine design.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Both bikes feature double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology. This provides powerful braking performance for both models. Additionally, the R 1250 R comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire, giving it an edge in terms of safety and technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the R 1250 R has a longer wheelbase of 1515 mm compared to the 1439 mm of the S 1000 R. The seat height of the R 1250 R is also slightly higher at 820 mm, while the S 1000 R has a seat height of 814 mm. The R 1250 R is heavier, with a kerb weight of 239 kg compared to the 205 kg of the S 1000 R. Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions and fuel tank capacities.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the S 1000 R 2017 is praised for having the best shift assistant in the naked bike league. It is considered a universal motorbike without any real weaknesses, offering a powerful engine, awesome sound, and great handling. It has a wide range of equipment and accessory options, powerful brakes, and a semi-active suspension that eliminates the need for setup fiddling.

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

On the other hand, the R 1250 R 2019 is commended for its powerful boxer engine, good sound, and comfortable seating position. It comes with ABS and traction control as standard, along with riding modes for added versatility. The R 1250 R also has a sporty look that appeals to riders looking for a stylish bike.

In terms of weaknesses, the S 1000 R 2017 is criticized for its original equipment tires not being of the finest premium quality. It also has an inactive seating position on the racetrack, which may not be ideal for riders seeking a more aggressive riding experience. The R 1250 R 2019, on the other hand, has a long surcharge list, meaning that additional features and accessories come at an extra cost. Additionally, visually, the R 1250 R does not offer any significant updates or changes compared to its predecessors.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 and the BMW R 1250 R 2019 are both powerful naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 R offers a higher power output and a wide range of equipment options, while the R 1250 R provides a comfortable seating position and advanced rider assistance systems. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2017 compared to BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2017
BMW R 1250 R 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore80 mmBore102.5 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke76 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque143 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid-air
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,254 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Ride by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,165 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth880 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,515 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)205 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)239 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW's universal talent also got better in 2017. The BMW offers the widest range of use and an exceptionally cultivated engine, a perfect gearbox and the best shift assistant in the field. It drives simply but quickly. You sit rather low in the vehicle.

Best shift assistant in the nakedbike league

Universal motorbike without any real weaknesses

Powerful engine, awesome sound, great handling

On the racetrack a slightly too inactive riding position

Very wide range of equipment and accessory options

Very powerful brakes

Semi-active suspension makes setup fiddling superfluous

Original equipment tyres not the finest premium goods

Inactive seating position on racetrack

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

What could be better than getting even more power and torque in an already powerful naked bike! The predecessor, the R 1200 R, with its 125 hp and Newton metres of torque, could already be ridden very sportily, but the enlarged R 1250 R, now with 136 hp and a massive 143 Newton metres, pushes the boxer power to its current peak. The special thing about the R 1250 R, as with its predecessor, is that thanks to the extensive range of accessories it can also convince on tours. The new engine with ShiftCam valve control is not only more powerful but also more refined. The chassis and brakes are also convincing, and the seating position is pleasantly upright, allowing a wide range of riding styles, from sporty push-off to long-distance touring.

powerful boxer engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

riding modes

sporty look

Long surcharge list

visually nothing new

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW R 1250 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2017 and a BMW R 1250 R 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 R 2019 is about 7% higher. Compared to BMW R 1250 R 2019 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 15. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1250 R with 83 days compared to 97 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 11 reviews for the BMW R 1250 R since model year 2019. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 73,800 views for the first review on BMW R 1250 R published on 11/6/2018.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1250 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH