Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs Kawasaki Z650 2021

When comparing the Kawasaki Ninja 650 model year 2017 and the Kawasaki Z650 model year 2021, it is important to note that both bikes share many similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with a bore of 83 mm and a stroke of 60 mm. The engine power and torque are also identical at 68.2 HP and 65.7 Nm respectively. The compression ratio, fuel system, throttle bore, cylinders, valves per cylinder, and cooling system are all the same as well. Both bikes have a displacement of 649 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both the Ninja 650 and Z650 feature a telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 41 mm. The rear suspension consists of a swing arm with a monoshock and preload adjustment. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel and has a tubular frame. The rake and trail measurements are also identical at 65.5 degrees and 100 mm respectively.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

When it comes to braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 300 mm and double piston technology. The brakes also feature petal technology. Both bikes are equipped with ABS as part of their advanced rider assistance systems.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The wheelbase, seat height, and fuel tank capacity are also identical. However, there is a slight difference in the kerb weight (with ABS) between the two models. The Ninja 650 2017 weighs 193 kg while the Z650 2021 weighs 187.1 kg.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Ninja 650 2017 is known for its transparent chassis, which provides a sporty feel and good handling. It also has excellent brakes and a sharp look inspired by the ZX-10R. The engine is resilient and offers a playful riding experience. However, some riders may find that the series exhaust does not produce much sound, and there may be slight vibrations from the engine.

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

On the other hand, the Z650 2021 has several strengths of its own. It is known for its accessible two-cylinder engine and compact dimensions, making it suitable for riders of all skill levels. The low seat height is also a plus for shorter riders. The chassis is stable, providing a confident riding experience. The bike features a TFT display with connectivity, adding a modern touch. Additionally, the Z650 has a more mature and grown-up look compared to its predecessor. However, taller riders may find the bike uncomfortable, and some riders may feel that the adrenaline level in the saddle is lower compared to competing models.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Kawasaki Z650 2021 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja 650 offers a sportier feel with excellent brakes and a sharp look, while the Z650 provides accessibility and a more mature design. Riders should consider their preferences and riding style when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Kawasaki Z650 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power68.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque65.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio10.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel125 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake65.5 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)187.1 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.

Transparent chassis for sport

playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R

resilient engine.

Little sound from the series pot

engine shows slight vibrations

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Even in 2021, the Kawasaki Z 650 stands for easy riding with great looks and good equipment. Both seat height and engine are very accessible and will give both experienced riders and newcomers a lot of pleasure. If you are looking for an honest naked bike without any big surprises, this is the bike for you. Due to its compact dimensions, however, you should try it out before buying and perhaps go for the raised seat.

accessible two-cylinder

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Probably uncomfortable for tall riders

adrenaline level in the saddle lower than with the competition

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and a Kawasaki Z650 2021. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. Compared to Kawasaki Z650 2021 there are less Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 25. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja 650 with 96 days compared to 106 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH