Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016

When comparing the Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016, there are several notable differences and similarities between the two naked bikes.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Speed Twin 1200 has an in-line crankpin offset engine with a displacement of 1200cc, producing 97 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the XSR900 features an in-line engine with a displacement of 847cc, generating 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. Both bikes have liquid cooling and a similar number of cylinders. However, the Speed Twin has a slightly larger engine displacement and torque output, while the XSR900 has a higher horsepower rating.

Regarding suspension, both bikes are equipped with upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm suspension in the rear. However, the XSR900 has a monoshock rear shock absorber, while the Speed Twin features dual shocks. This difference may result in variations in ride comfort and handling characteristics.

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

In terms of chassis, the Speed Twin has a steel frame with a central tube design, while the XSR900 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The choice of materials and frame design can significantly impact the bike's weight, rigidity, and overall handling.

Both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes in the front, with the Speed Twin having a larger diameter of 305mm compared to the XSR900's 298mm. This may result in slight differences in braking performance. Additionally, both bikes feature ABS as standard, providing advanced rider assistance systems for improved safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Speed Twin has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 160mm, with both tires having a diameter of 17 inches. The XSR900 has a slightly wider rear tire width of 180mm. The Speed Twin has a wheelbase of 1430mm, while the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm. The seat height of the Speed Twin is 807mm, while the XSR900 has a slightly higher seat height of 815mm. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity, with the Speed Twin holding 14.5 liters and the XSR900 holding 14 liters.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

In terms of strengths, the Speed Twin is praised for its beautiful design, low seat height, accessible and easy handling, and a powerful 1200cc engine producing 97 horsepower. On the other hand, the XSR900 is commended for its powerful engine, well-tuned riding modes, standard ABS and TC, authentic modern design, and clean workmanship.

However, the Speed Twin has some weaknesses, including a sharp knee angle for tall riders, a slightly rough response in Sport mode, and reports of a squeaky rear brake during testing. The XSR900 has its own weaknesses, such as a hard chassis, a seat that could be more comfortable, and a speedblock design that is already present on many other models.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 have their own unique features and characteristics. The Speed Twin offers a beautifully designed bike with a low seat height and a powerful engine, while the XSR900 provides a greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and a modern design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019
Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeIn line
BoreBore97.6 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power97 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,950 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,200 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake22.8 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail93.5 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter305 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth760 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height807 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019

The Triumph Speed Twin 1200 looks like a magnificent but also powerful motorbike in the photos. But even when test riding it, it becomes slender and dainty. On the test ride, it goes even further. It is an accessible and easy-to-ride motorbike. In fact, it's small, compact and lively. A good choice if you want to ride 1200 cc and 97 hp and always thought that was way too much. In detail, the Triumph is lovingly and beautifully finished. A heart-warming motorbike.

Beautifully designed - even with the details not immediately visible

low seat height

accessible and easy handling

1200cc and 97hp - easy to ride but still emotionally served.

Sharp knee angle for tall people

slightly rough response in Sport mode

squeaky rear brake during test

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Twin 1200 vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 is about 57% higher. A Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 experiences a loss of 730 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,650 USD for a Yamaha XSR900 2016. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016 there are more Triumph Speed Twin 1200 2019 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 87 days for the Triumph Speed Twin 1200. Since model year 2019 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the Triumph Speed Twin 1200 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Speed Twin 1200 was published on 12/4/2018 and now has more than 90,200 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 11/25/2015.

Price Triumph Speed Twin 1200

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen