BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
![BMW S 1000 R 2014 BMW S 1000 R 2014](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2014/7-BMW/7592-S_1000_R/1.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1168&height=664&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
BMW S 1000 R 2014
![KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2011/1-KTM/3854-990_Super_Duke_R/gr.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1168&height=664&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 are both powerful naked bikes with impressive specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 takes the lead with 160 HP compared to the KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011's 131 HP. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. The torque is also higher in the BMW at 112 Nm, compared to the KTM's 102 Nm.
Both bikes have a four-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999 ccm, providing a similar level of performance. They also feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, ensuring a smooth and controlled ride.
![BMW S 1000 R 2014 BMW S 1000 R 2014](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2014/7-BMW/7592-S_1000_R/10.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1900&height=1156&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
BMW S 1000 R 2014
The chassis of the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is made of aluminum, while the KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. This difference in material may result in variations in weight and handling characteristics. The BMW's frame type is a twin tube, which is known for its stability and rigidity, while the KTM has a tubular frame.
Both bikes have four-piston front brakes with radial technology, ensuring excellent stopping power and control. The front tire width is the same for both models at 120 mm, but the KTM has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm, compared to the BMW's 190 mm. The wheelbase is also slightly longer in the KTM at 1450 mm, compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. The seat height is higher in the KTM at 865 mm, while the BMW has a more comfortable seat height of 814 mm. The fuel tank capacity is slightly larger in the KTM at 18.5 liters, compared to the BMW's 17.5 liters.
![KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2011/1-KTM/3854-990_Super_Duke_R/gr.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1900&height=1156&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, and very good electronic helpers. It also has a terrific price/performance ratio and is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads. On the other hand, the KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 boasts a powerful engine with plenty of power, positive handling, a sophisticated design, and adjustment options for customization. It also has a reliable braking system.
As for weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. It also tempts riders to overdrive and has a design that is subjective and a matter of personal taste. The KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011, on the other hand, has a chassis that may not be suitable for beginners due to its handling characteristics. Additionally, the visual design of the KTM remains the same, which may not appeal to those looking for a fresh and updated look.
Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be power, handling, design, or customization options.
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 R 2014
![BMW S 1000 R 2014 BMW S 1000 R 2014](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2014/7-BMW/7592-S_1000_R/3.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1388&height=980&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011
![KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011 KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011](https://images5.1000ps.net/images_bikekat/2011/1-KTM/3854-990_Super_Duke_R/gr.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1388&height=980&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
Engine, chassis and brakes mastered the tough test in the race perfectly. The world press was convinced and is now reporting around the globe about a race on a racing motorbike that is actually a normal road bike with registration, warranty and number plate.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 990 Super Duke R
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a KTM 990 Super Duke R 2011. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 80 days for a KTM 990 Super Duke R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 9 reviews for the KTM 990 Super Duke R since model year 2007. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 23,700 views for the first review on KTM 990 Super Duke R published on 5/20/2007.