Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

The Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015 and the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.

Starting with the Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015, it boasts a powerful engine with 48 HP and 60 Nm of torque. The air cooling system ensures efficient heat dissipation, while the 744cc displacement provides ample power for various riding conditions. The telescopic fork front suspension offers a smooth and comfortable ride, and the double cradle frame type provides stability and durability. The Brembo four-piston front brakes ensure reliable stopping power, and the 100mm front and 130mm rear tyre widths provide good traction. With a wheelbase of 1449mm and a seat height of 790mm, the V7 II Stone offers a comfortable riding position. Additionally, the 22-liter fuel tank capacity allows for longer rides without frequent refueling.

On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018 features a slightly lower engine power of 47 HP and torque of 52 Nm. The oil-air cooling system ensures efficient heat management, and the 648cc displacement offers sufficient power for various riding needs. Similar to the Moto Guzzi, it also has a telescopic fork front suspension for a smooth ride. The load-bearing engine frame type provides stability and strength. The Brembo double-piston front brakes offer reliable stopping power, and the 100mm front and 130mm rear tyre widths ensure good traction. With a wheelbase of 1400mm and a seat height of 790mm, the Continental GT 650 offers a comfortable riding position. However, the fuel tank capacity is slightly smaller at 12.5 liters, which may require more frequent refueling during long rides.

Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015

In terms of strengths, the Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015 is individually upgradeable, allowing riders to customize and enhance their bike according to their preferences. Its cool look and beginner-friendly nature make it appealing to riders who value style and ease of use. The V7 II Stone also performs well without the pressure to achieve high speeds, making it suitable for riders who prioritize a relaxed and enjoyable riding experience. Additionally, its design and features make it suitable for riding on gravel roads, providing versatility for different terrains.

On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018 offers an agile and refined powerplant, providing a smooth and exhilarating ride. The cool two-cylinder sound adds to the overall riding experience. The comfortable seating position ensures long-distance comfort, and the stable handling allows for confident maneuvering. The good brakes provide reliable stopping power, and the classic round instruments add to the bike's old-school charm. Furthermore, the Continental GT 650 is reasonably priced, making it an attractive option for riders looking for a classic bike without breaking the bank.

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

However, the Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015 does have some weaknesses. Its performance may be considered modest compared to other bikes in its class. Additionally, the workmanship may be mediocre, which could affect the overall quality and durability of the bike. The high price for the entire kit may also deter some potential buyers.

Similarly, the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018 has its weaknesses. The ABS may not be as sensitive as desired, which could impact the bike's safety features. Additionally, the lack of electronic features may be a drawback for riders who rely on these technologies.

In conclusion, both the Moto Guzzi V7 II Stone 2015 and the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018 offer unique features and strengths. The Moto Guzzi is known for its upgradeability, cool look, and beginner-friendly nature, while the Royal Enfield stands out with its agile powerplant, comfortable seating position, and classic design. However, both bikes have their weaknesses, such as the Moto Guzzi's modest performance and high price, and the Royal Enfield's less sensitive ABS and lack of electronic features. Ultimately, riders should consider their preferences and priorities to choose the bike that best suits their needs.