Beta Evo 300 2T 2014 vs. Beta RR 390 2015

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 300 2T 2014 compared to Beta RR 390 2015

Beta Evo 300 2T 2014

Beta RR 390 2015

Show all

Same only

Differences

Beta Evo 300 2T 2014

Beta RR 390 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	79 mm	Bore	95 mm
Stroke	Stroke	60.5 mm	Stroke	56.2 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	10.2	Compression Ratio	12.4
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	296.4 ccm	Displacement	398 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Aluminium	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Twin Tube	Frame type	Double cradle

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Double piston

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Single piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	80 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	110 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Length	Length	1,990 mm	Length	2,180 mm
Width	Width	850 mm	Width	807 mm
Height	Height	1,115 mm	Height	1,270 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,305 mm	Wheelbase	1,475 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	660 mm	Seat Height	940 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	68.5 kg	Dry Weight	113 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	2.6 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8 l