BMW S 1000 RR 2014 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2014 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW S 1000 RR model year 2014 and the BMW S 1000 R model year 2016 are both impressive motorcycles from BMW, but they have some notable differences.

Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an in-line engine with the same bore and stroke measurements of 80mm and 49.7mm respectively. They also have the same displacement of 999cc and four cylinders. However, the S 1000 RR 2014 has a higher engine power of 192 HP compared to the S 1000 R 2016 which has 160 HP. Both bikes have the same torque of 112 Nm, but the S 1000 RR 2014 has a higher compression ratio of 13 compared to the S 1000 R 2016 which has 12.

In terms of suspension, the S 1000 RR 2014 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the S 1000 R 2016 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. Both bikes have a swing arm rear suspension. The chassis for both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame type.

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

For the braking system, both bikes have double disk front brakes with four pistons and radial technology. This ensures powerful braking performance for both models.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter of 120mm and 17 inches respectively. They also have the same wheelbase of around 1430mm. However, the S 1000 R 2016 has a slightly lower seat height of 814mm compared to the S 1000 RR 2014 which has 820mm. Both bikes have a kerb weight of 207kg with ABS and a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the S 1000 RR 2014 is praised for its powerful engine, superior electronics package, and superb shift assistant. It is also versatile for both track and road use and despite its high performance, it is considered easy to ride.

On the other hand, the S 1000 R 2016 is commended for its powerful and well-controllable engine, as well as its powerful braking system. It also offers a comfortable seating position for the rider.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

However, both models have their weaknesses. The S 1000 RR 2014 can become quite expensive in the fully equipped version, and its stability can be a bit tricky. Additionally, the packages offered by BMW are sometimes focused on profit maximization rather than customer benefits.

Similarly, the S 1000 R 2016 has expensive optional extras that can be hard to resist. It also has a hard chassis, which may not be as comfortable for some riders.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 RR 2014 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both impressive motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 RR 2014 offers a more powerful engine and a versatile riding experience, while the S 1000 R 2016 provides a well-controllable engine and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2014 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,056 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth826 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,432 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2015 buyers are closer than ever to a World Superbike Championship machine and will be able to ride it faster than ever before.

Powerful engine

superior electronics package

superb shift assistant

versatile for track and road use

despite high performance, a bike that is easy to ride.

In the fully equipped version, the price skyrockets

stability is a bit tricky

packages subject to surcharges are put together with a focus on profit maximisation and not with a focus on customer benefits.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2014 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 56 days compared to 69 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH