Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs. Honda CRF250R 2009

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Honda CRF250R 2009

Honda CRF250R 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs Honda CRF250R 2009

The Husqvarna FC 250 model year 2016 and the Honda CRF250R model year 2009 are both motocross bikes that offer impressive performance on the track. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both bikes have a bore of 78 mm, indicating the same cylinder diameter. The Husqvarna FC 250 has a stroke of 52.3 mm, slightly longer than the Honda CRF250R's stroke of 52.2 mm. This means that the Husqvarna FC 250 has a slightly larger displacement of 249.9 ccm compared to the Honda CRF250R's 249.4 ccm. Additionally, the Husqvarna FC 250 has a higher compression ratio of 13.9, while the Honda CRF250R has a compression ratio of 13. Both bikes have a 4-stroke engine with a single cylinder. However, the Husqvarna FC 250 features an electric starter, while the Honda CRF250R relies on a kick starter.

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Husqvarna FC 250 is equipped with WP brand suspension, while the Honda CRF250R features Showa suspension at both the front and rear. This difference in suspension brands may result in variations in performance and handling.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 19 inches. The Husqvarna FC 250 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1495 mm compared to the Honda CRF250R's 1477 mm. In terms of seat height, the Husqvarna FC 250 stands taller at 992 mm, while the Honda CRF250R has a seat height of 965 mm.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Husqvarna FC 250 2016 is known for its impressive performance and has a range of strengths. However, it is reserved for factory teams only, which means it may not be easily accessible to the general public. Additionally, the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 is considered to be expensive.

Honda CRF250R 2009

Honda CRF250R 2009

On the other hand, the Honda CRF250R 2009 has several strengths. It offers top-end performance, thanks to its improved engine. The bike is also lighter and provides playful handling, making it a joy to ride. The positive chassis and stability, even at high speeds, are also notable strengths of the Honda CRF250R. Surprisingly, there are no mentioned weaknesses for this model.

In conclusion, the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and the Honda CRF250R 2009 are both impressive motocross bikes with their own set of strengths and weaknesses. While the Husqvarna FC 250 offers excellent performance, it may be limited to factory teams and comes with a higher price tag. On the other hand, the Honda CRF250R provides top-end performance, lighter weight, improved engine, playful handling, positive chassis, and stability, making it a strong contender in the motocross market.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 250 2016 compared to Honda CRF250R 2009

Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Honda CRF250R 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke52.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.9 Compression Ratio13
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement249.9 ccmDisplacement249.4 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandShowa

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandShowa

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,477 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height992 mmSeat Height965 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.4 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Since only factory riders and selected journalists will ever ride these motocrossers, it makes no sense to write a conclusion. Basically, what we are talking about here is the best and fastest motorbike stuff in off-road. Every part is handpicked and supplied and machined by the best companies. Riders can have their vehicles 100% customised to their needs and to the track at hand. From that point of view, you can no longer speak of any weaknesses here.

all

Reserved for factory teams only

expensive

Honda CRF250R 2009

Honda CRF250R 2009

The new 250 combines the power of the 4-stroke with the advantages of the 2-stroke and that is impressive.

Top-end performance

lighter, improved engine

playful handling

positive chassis

stable - even at a brisk pace.

None

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 250 vs Honda CRF250R

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and a Honda CRF250R 2009. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 40 days for a Honda CRF250R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 and 22 reviews for the Honda CRF250R since model year 2009. The first review for the Husqvarna FC 250 was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 6,400 views for the first review on Honda CRF250R published on 5/28/2003.

Price Husqvarna FC 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CRF250R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG