Beta Evo 290 2T 2011 vs. Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Loading...

Overview - Beta Evo 290 2T 2011 vs Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 290 2T 2011 compared to Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011
Ossa Tr 280i 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke60.5 mmStroke60 mm
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement289.1 ccmDisplacement272 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,328 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height655 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight69 kgDry Weight67 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity3 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Evo 290 2T vs Ossa Tr 280i

Price Beta Evo 290 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Ossa Tr 280i

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG