Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010 are both powerful naked bikes that offer exhilarating riding experiences. However, there are some key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Speed Triple 1050 is equipped with a 1050cc inline three-cylinder engine, producing 132 horsepower and 110 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Brutale 1090 RR boasts a larger 1078cc inline four-cylinder engine, delivering a higher power output of 147 horsepower and 115 Nm of torque. This gives the Brutale a clear advantage in terms of raw power and acceleration.

Both bikes feature liquid cooling systems and upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspensions, providing stability and control during rides. The Speed Triple 1050 has a Twin Tube frame type, while the Brutale 1090 RR has a Tubular frame type. Although both frames are designed to offer rigidity and strength, the specific characteristics of each frame may result in slight differences in handling and maneuverability.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm. However, the Brutale 1090 RR has a larger rear tire diameter of 18 inches compared to the Speed Triple 1050's 17-inch rear tire diameter. This may affect the overall handling and stability of the bikes, with the Brutale potentially offering better traction and grip.

The wheelbase of the Speed Triple 1050 is slightly shorter at 1437mm compared to the Brutale 1090 RR's 1438mm. This difference may result in slight variations in agility and maneuverability, with the Speed Triple potentially offering slightly sharper handling.

In terms of seat height, the Speed Triple 1050 has a slightly lower seat height of 828mm compared to the Brutale 1090 RR's 830mm. This may be beneficial for riders with shorter inseams, as it allows for easier ground reach and increased confidence while stationary.

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

When it comes to strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and overall stability. On the other hand, the Brutale 1090 RR is highly regarded for its unbeatable design, extremely high performance, and bravura acceleration and pull-through values.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Speed Triple 1050 is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disrupt the harmony between rider and machine. On the other hand, the Brutale 1090 RR is known to consume a lot of fuel and has a higher purchase price, making it less economical and accessible for some riders.

In conclusion, while both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010 offer thrilling riding experiences, the Brutale stands out with its higher power output and exceptional design. However, the Speed Triple impresses with its controlled chassis and stable performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power147 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,600 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque115 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,078 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,093 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth760 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,438 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height830 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010

But those who can and want to make the major financial investment will get a unique two-wheeled work of art, equipped with the highest-quality components for victory on the mountain. The Brutale has long since won the battle for the crown in front of the ice cream parlour anyway.

Unbeatable design

extremely high performance

bravura acceleration and pull-through values.

Consumes a lot of fuel

high purchase price.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR 2010. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 211 days for a MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 2 reviews for the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 36,900 views for the first review on MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR published on 8/24/2010.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGSchuberthcalimoto GmbH