BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2019

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and a comfortable riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is equipped with a 999cc in-line four-cylinder engine that produces 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a slightly smaller 948cc in-line four-cylinder engine that delivers 125.4 horsepower and 98.6 Nm of torque. While both bikes have four cylinders and similar engine types, the BMW offers more power and torque.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a monoshock rear shock absorber, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 also utilizes a monoshock setup. Both bikes provide a comfortable and stable ride, with the BMW offering the additional feature of dynamic suspension as part of its advanced rider assistance systems.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of chassis, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design can affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes are equipped with double disc brakes at the front, with four-piston calipers providing excellent stopping power. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features petal technology. The choice of braking technology can influence the feel and performance of the brakes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is 1439 mm, while the Kawasaki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm. The seat height of the BMW is 814 mm, while the Kawasaki offers a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The kerb weight of the BMW is 207 kg with ABS, while the Kawasaki weighs slightly more at 210 kg with ABS.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 is commended for its light and natural handling, high stability, silky engine with full pull from mid revs, high chassis transparency, and great feedback. The Z900 also offers a sitting position with a feel-good factor and a fair price.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 does have some weaknesses, including expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. The Kawasaki Z900 2019 has its own weaknesses, such as a TFT display mounted too low, cumbersome menu operation, and rear view mirrors that offer modest visibility.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are powerful naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. The BMW excels in terms of engine power and braking performance, while the Kawasaki offers a lighter and more agile handling experience. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth820 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 21% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 230 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2019. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 40. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 116 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH