Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs. Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs Kawasaki Z 400 2019

The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2011 and the Kawasaki Z 400 model year 2019 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have an in-line engine, liquid cooling, and a steel frame. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has a more powerful engine with 72 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z 400 2019, which has 45 HP. The ER-6n also has a higher torque of 66 Nm compared to the Z 400's 38 Nm. This means that the ER-6n will provide a more powerful and responsive ride.

In terms of weight, the Kawasaki Z 400 2019 is significantly lighter than the ER-6n 2011. The Z 400 has a kerb weight of 167 kg, while the ER-6n weighs 208 kg with ABS. This lighter weight makes the Z 400 more agile and easier to handle, especially for novice riders.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

The dimensions of the two bikes also differ. The Z 400 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1370 mm compared to the ER-6n's 1410 mm. The seat height of the Z 400 is also slightly lower at 785 mm compared to the ER-6n's 790 mm. These differences in dimensions may result in slightly different riding positions and handling characteristics.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double piston front brakes with petal technology. However, the ER-6n has double disc brakes, while the Z 400 has a single disc brake. This means that the ER-6n may provide better braking performance and control.

Both bikes have monoshock rear suspension, which helps provide a comfortable ride. The ER-6n has wider front and rear tires compared to the Z 400, with a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 160 mm. The Z 400 has a front tire width of 110 mm and a rear tire width of 150 mm. These differences in tire width may affect the bike's handling and grip on the road.

In terms of fuel capacity, the ER-6n has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 15.5 liters, while the Z 400 has a smaller tank with a capacity of 14 liters. This means that the ER-6n may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

In terms of strengths, the ER-6n has ABS, wider handlebars, a slimmer waist, increased intake noise, a comfortable seat, and an uncomplicated chassis. On the other hand, the Z 400 has a great, very controllable power delivery, low weight, a good seating position, great sound, and is very suitable for novice riders.

In terms of weaknesses, the ER-6n does not have any listed weaknesses. However, the Z 400 has non-adjustable clutch and brake levers, as well as a limited adjustable chassis. These limitations may affect the bike's customization options and overall comfort for the rider.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and the Kawasaki Z 400 2019 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The ER-6n offers more power and a larger fuel tank, while the Z 400 is lighter and more suitable for novice riders. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 compared to Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore70 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke51.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power45 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque66 NmTorque38 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement399 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
LengthLength2,100 mmLength1,990 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)167 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

The Kawasaki Z400 is definitely a great evolution of its predecessor, the Z300. More power, less weight - all around, simply an even better bike. Above all, the linear power delivery and excellent handling make the Z400 an ideal entry-level bike. The ease of clutch operation and good chassis set-up are also in this vein, which is why the Z400 can be recommended to novice riders without hesitation.

Great, very controllable power delivery

Low weight

Good seating position

Great sound

Very suitable for novice riders.

Non-adjustable clutch and brake levers

Limited adjustable chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z 400

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and a Kawasaki Z 400 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z 400 2019 is about 27% higher. A Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 experiences a loss of 230 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 270 USD for a Kawasaki Z 400 2019. Compared to Kawasaki Z 400 2019 there are less Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 49 days compared to 99 days for a Kawasaki Z 400. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 8 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 400 since model year 2019. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 6/29/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 23,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z 400 published on 10/2/2018.

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG