BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

When comparing the BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017, there are several notable differences and similarities to consider.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW F 700 GS has a larger bore and stroke at 82 mm and 75.6 mm respectively, compared to the Suzuki V-Strom 650's 81 mm bore and 62.6 mm stroke. The BMW also has a slightly higher engine power at 75 HP, compared to the Suzuki's 71 HP. However, the Suzuki has a higher torque at 62 Nm, compared to the BMW's 77 Nm. Both motorcycles have a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 798 ccm for the BMW and 645 ccm for the Suzuki.

Both motorcycles have a chain transmission and a swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the BMW features a steel frame while the Suzuki has an aluminum frame. The BMW's frame is tubular and load-bearing, while the Suzuki's frame is a twin tube design.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

In terms of braking, both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front. The BMW offers advanced rider assistance systems with electronically adjustable suspension, while the Suzuki has ABS as standard.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The BMW has a rear tire width of 140 mm, while the Suzuki has a wider rear tire at 150 mm. The wheelbase is slightly longer on the BMW at 1562 mm, compared to the Suzuki's 1560 mm. The seat height is also slightly lower on the BMW at 820 mm, compared to the Suzuki's 830 mm. The BMW has a kerb weight of 209 kg with ABS, while the Suzuki weighs slightly more at 213 kg. The Suzuki also has a larger fuel tank capacity at 20 liters, compared to the BMW's 16 liters.

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 700 GS is praised for being very manageable, surprisingly powerful, and having a comfortable seating position with a low seat height. It also has good brakes and is considered to be priced well. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 is praised for its lively and economical engine, balanced handling, good wind protection, and the inclusion of traction control and ABS as standard. It also has a stylish design resembling its larger sibling and offers extensive instrumentation with a gear indicator. Additionally, it has a 12-volt socket in the cockpit area and is considered to be competitively priced.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 700 GS is criticized for its optics, although specific details are not provided. The Suzuki V-Strom 650 is noted to have a very restrictive traction control mode 2.

Overall, both motorcycles have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them would depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

BMW F 700 GS 2016
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke62.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power71 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,800 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque62 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYesCan be restricted for A2 licenceYes
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement645 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustableAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,275 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth835 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,405 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,560 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)213 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

The small V-Strom 650 is not only visually close to the big V-Strom 1000 with its pronounced duckbill, stacked headlights and extensive instruments. The equipment does not correspond at all to what is understood by "cheap entry": traction control, lively Euro4 engine, harmonious handling and additional techno-gadgets such as Low RPM Assist or Suzuki Easy Start System. To the delight of the customers, the price is kept within reasonable limits.

Lively, economical engine

balanced handling

good wind protection

traction control and ABS as standard

looks in the style of its big sister

extensive instrumentation with gear indicator

12-volt socket in the cockpit area

good price.

Traction control in mode 2 very restrictive

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs Suzuki V-Strom 650

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 700 GS 2016 and a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 is about 7% higher. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 there are more BMW F 700 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 650 with 89 days compared to 90 days for the BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS and 38 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 700 GS was published on 7/2/2012 and now has more than 18,800 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 650 published on 9/16/2003.

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG