KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs. KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Loading...

Overview - KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the KTM 250 EXC-F 2016 are both powerful enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. However, there are some key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine and drive train, the KTM 350 EXC-F has a larger bore of 88 mm compared to the 78 mm bore of the KTM 250 EXC-F. This means that the 350 EXC-F has a larger piston size, resulting in a higher displacement of 349.7 ccm compared to the 249.91 ccm of the 250 EXC-F. The stroke of the 350 EXC-F is also slightly longer at 57.5 mm compared to the 52.3 mm stroke of the 250 EXC-F. Both models have electric starters, but the 350 EXC-F also has a kick starter option.

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Both models have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, with the same brand, WP. The rear suspension also uses WP brand components. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel and has a central tube frame type. The dimensions and weights of the two models are also very similar, with the same front tire diameter of 21 inches, rear tire width of 140 mm, and rear tire diameter of 18 inches. They also have the same wheelbase of 1482 mm, seat height of 970 mm, and fuel tank capacity of 9 liters. However, the dry weight of the 350 EXC-F is slightly higher at 107.2 kg compared to the 105.5 kg of the 250 EXC-F.

Now, let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The KTM 350 EXC-F is described as a powerful, agile, and fast racing machine. It combines the advantages of a four-stroke engine, such as responsive engine response and efficient fuel consumption, with lightness and sufficient power. On the other hand, the KTM 250 EXC-F is said to be easy to ride in every respect, with unbeatable traction and power delivery. It is particularly suitable for beginners as it offers easier handling compared to two-stroke bikes. The weight difference between the two models is minimal, so the 250 EXC-F still provides good handling.

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 350 EXC-F is described as more radical and slightly more nervous than the 250 EXC-F. It requires more concentration from the rider but also offers more speed. While the pull-through has improved, it is still not perfect, and some riders may find themselves wishing for the power of a 450. On the other hand, the KTM 250 EXC-F, despite being a great bike for beginners, is almost as expensive as the "big" enduro bikes. Additionally, lifting the front wheel over obstacles requires better riding technique compared to the 350 or 450 models.

In summary, the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 is a powerful and fast racing machine, combining the advantages of a four-stroke engine with lightness and sufficient power. The KTM 250 EXC-F 2016, on the other hand, is easy to ride and offers unbeatable traction and power delivery. While the 350 EXC-F may be more radical and require more concentration, the 250 EXC-F is a great bike for beginners with slightly more demanding riding technique. Both models have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and skill level.

Technical Specifications KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 compared to KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke52.3 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.3 Compression Ratio12.8
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement249.91 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107.2 kgDry Weight105.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

The box-office hit of recent years has been improved with pinpoint accuracy. The usable rev range has been widened, making the 350 a little easier to ride than before. But it still feels like the most radical machine among the 4-stroke models. It combines the advantages of the "250" and "450" but also their disadvantages. Nevertheless: 90% of all KTM customers will set the fastest time on the special test with the 350 EXC-F. It is the most universal purchase recommendation for enduro racers.

Powerful, agile, fast - a real racing machine

The advantages of the four-stroke (engine response, dosing, consumption,...) combined with lightness and sufficient power.

More radical than the 250 and a bit more nervous than the 450. Requires more concentration but also offers more speed

pull-through has improved, but still not so perfect that you don't sometimes wish you had a 450.

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

The big 2017 upgrade has been particularly good for the small four-stroke. Because KTM has been able to further increase the power on the lively machine. Now even those riders for whom it was just a tad too weak can try it again. Of course, it has become even more manageable and all the new strengths of the 2017 models also apply to it. But with its 40 hp, it has broadened its target group more than the other 17 models.

Easy to ride - in every respect

traction and power delivery unbeatable

beginners hold the line easier with it than with the 2-strokes

in terms of weight, there is only a slight difference in handling compared to 2-strokes.

Actually a great bike for beginners, but equipped like the "big ones" it is also almost as expensive as a "big" Enduro

Lifting the front wheel over obstacles requires better riding technique than with a 350 or 450.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 350 EXC-F vs KTM 250 EXC-F

There are a few key differences between a KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and a KTM 250 EXC-F 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 250 EXC-F with 44 days compared to 76 days for the KTM 350 EXC-F. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the KTM 350 EXC-F and 14 reviews for the KTM 250 EXC-F since model year 2007. The first review for the KTM 350 EXC-F was published on 11/2/2010 and now has more than 10,800 views. This compares to more than 25,200 views for the first review on KTM 250 EXC-F published on 7/5/2006.

Price KTM 350 EXC-F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 250 EXC-F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH