BMW S 1000 XR 2016 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 XR 2016 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

The BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 are both sport touring motorcycles that offer powerful engines and advanced rider assistance systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW S 1000 XR is equipped with an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT features a V-twin engine that delivers a higher power output of 173 horsepower and 144 Nm of torque. This gives the KTM a slight advantage in terms of raw power.

Both motorcycles have a chain transmission system and a 4-stroke engine configuration. The BMW has a displacement of 999cc, while the KTM has a larger displacement of 1301cc. This means that the KTM has a larger engine, which may contribute to its higher power output.

In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 XR is equipped with a telescopic fork front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension. The suspension can be adjusted for compression and rebound. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension and a single swing arm rear suspension. The suspension on the KTM can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. Both motorcycles offer a stable road holding and can be adjusted to suit the rider's preferences.

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

In terms of chassis, the BMW S 1000 XR features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT has a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design. Both frames are designed to provide stability and durability.

Both motorcycles are equipped with double disk front brakes with radial technology. The BMW has a standard double disk front brake setup, while the KTM features radial monoblock technology. This may provide the KTM with slightly better braking performance.

Both motorcycles come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. These systems help to enhance the safety and stability of the motorcycles.

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1548mm compared to the KTM's 1482mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 840mm compared to the KTM's 835mm. The KTM has a larger fuel tank capacity of 23 liters, while the BMW has a capacity of 20 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 XR is praised for its sharp engine, sharp design, high-quality workmanship, stable road holding, and comfortable seat. It also offers successful ergonomics, even for tall riders. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT is praised for its extensive standard equipment, sensational engine, unique design, and uncomplicated pannier system.

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 XR has slight vibrations from the engine and could have better wind protection. The KTM 1290 Super Duke GT also has poor wind protection, a manual windshield adjustment, and quite high fuel consumption.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 are both impressive sport touring motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a sharp engine and design, high-quality workmanship, and comfortable ergonomics. The KTM, on the other hand, boasts extensive standard equipment, a powerful engine, and a unique design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 XR 2016 compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016
KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore80 mmBore108 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power173 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque144 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,301 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,548 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height840 mmSeat Height835 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity23 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

The BMW S 1000 XR is a superbly crafted performance motorbike with a proud pedigree that shines with impeccable touring characteristics and solid touring capability. A wide range of accessories either trim the bike even more in the direction of sport or equip it for the great journey. With ABS and ASC as standard, you're always on the safe side and always relaxed thanks to the pleasant ergonomics. Just don't misunderstand the XR as an enduro for on/off-road, but see it as the evolution of a sport tourer.

Sharp engine

sharp design

high-quality workmanship

stable road holding

ABS and ASC standard

comfortable seat

successful ergonomics even for tall riders.

slight vibrations from the engine

wind protection could be better

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

With generous standard equipment, a retuned engine and unmistakably edgy KTM design, the 1290 Super Duke GT aims to enter the sport touring segment. With rideable performance and the full power of the naked bike in the spirit of the "Ready-to-Race" credo, it stands out from the competition not only visually. The mattighofen sports fanatics even fit heated grips and cruise control to offer frequent riders a nice spot. Somehow they still manage to remain credible and to trigger storms of enthusiasm in the rider.

extensive standard equipment

sensational engine

unique design

uncomplicated pannier system

Poor wind protection

manual windshield adjustment

quite high fuel consumption

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 XR vs KTM 1290 Super Duke GT

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is about 15% higher. A BMW S 1000 XR 2016 experiences a loss of 970 USD in one year and 2,660 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 710 USD and 2,730 USD for a KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016. Compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 there are more BMW S 1000 XR 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 13. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 XR with 89 days compared to 106 days for a KTM 1290 Super Duke GT. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 40 reviews for the BMW S 1000 XR and 22 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW S 1000 XR was published on 10/21/2014 and now has more than 16,000 views. This compares to more than 23,600 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke GT published on 11/17/2015.

Price BMW S 1000 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH