KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 vs BMW S 1000 R 2015

When comparing the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 and the BMW S 1000 R 2015, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 boasts an impressive 173 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R 2015 falls slightly behind with 160 HP. This gives the KTM an advantage in terms of sheer power and acceleration.

In terms of torque, the KTM comes out on top again with 144 Nm, compared to the BMW's 112 Nm. This means that the KTM will have better low-end power and acceleration.

The KTM has a 2-cylinder engine, while the BMW has a 4-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration can affect the overall performance and sound of the bike.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, providing excellent handling and stability. The KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW has an aluminum frame. The choice of frame material can impact the overall weight and rigidity of the bike.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

In terms of braking technology, both bikes feature four-piston front brakes with radial technology. This ensures powerful and precise braking performance.

When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS and traction control. However, the BMW also offers dynamic suspension, which can enhance the bike's overall performance and handling.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1482 mm, compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. This can affect the bike's stability and maneuverability.

The seat height of the KTM is 835 mm, while the BMW has a slightly lower seat height at 814 mm. This can make a difference in terms of rider comfort and reach to the ground.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

In terms of weight, the KTM has a kerb weight of 189 kg with ABS, while the BMW weighs slightly more at 207 kg. This can impact the bike's agility and handling.

Both bikes have fuel tank capacities that are similar, with the KTM having an 18 l capacity and the BMW having a 17.5 l capacity.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is praised for its precise handling, traction control, and powerful engine. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is commended for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position.

However, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 does have a weakness in its high price, while the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is criticized for its expensive optional extras, hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars.

Overall, both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power173 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)189 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

With all the power and hard "Beast videos" from KTM, this horsepower monster is actually a 100% everyday bike for touring or going to work.

precise handling

traction control

powerful engine

High price

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 and a BMW S 1000 R 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2015 is about 7% higher. A KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 experiences a loss of 1,500 USD in one year and 2,500 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 250 USD and 600 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2015. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2015 there are less KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a KTM 1290 Super Duke R with 46 days compared to 61 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R was published on 11/8/2012 and now has more than 4,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG