Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is equipped with a powerful three-cylinder engine that delivers 135 horsepower and 111 Nm of torque. This engine provides a sporty driving feel and offers excellent acceleration. The bike's upright seating position allows for a comfortable and commanding riding experience. Additionally, the stable aluminum frame ensures precise handling and stability on the road.

On the other hand, the Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019 features a single-cylinder engine with 75 horsepower and 72 Nm of torque. While not as powerful as the Speed Triple, this engine is still a gem for single-cylinder enthusiasts. The bike's chassis, made of chromium-molybdenum, provides smooth handling without feeling nervous. The Svartpilen 701 offers a wide range of use, performing well on various road conditions, including bad asphalt. The seating position is pleasant, especially in city traffic.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

In terms of suspension, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 is equipped with Showa suspension elements. However, some riders may find these elements slightly uncomfortable. The bike's handling can also be described as stubborn, requiring more effort to maneuver compared to other naked bikes.

The Svartpilen 701 2019 also features Upside-Down telescopic fork suspension, but with WP brand elements. This suspension setup provides a great balance between comfort and performance. However, on long motorway journeys, riders may experience some vibrations, which can be slightly annoying. The seat for both the driver and passenger is also considered hard, potentially causing discomfort during longer rides. Additionally, the cockpit of the Svartpilen 701 is not very easy to read, which may be a drawback for some riders.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 190 mm, and a wheelbase of 1435 mm. The seat height is 825 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is 17.5 liters.

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

The Svartpilen 701 2019, on the other hand, has a front tire diameter of 18 inches, a rear tire width of 160 mm, and a wheelbase of 1434 mm. The seat height is slightly higher at 830 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is smaller at 12 liters.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 offers a powerful and sporty riding experience with its three-cylinder engine and stable frame. However, some riders may find the suspension elements uncomfortable and the handling stubborn. On the other hand, the Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019 provides smooth handling, a versatile engine, and a pleasant seating position. However, the bike may suffer from vibrations on long motorway journeys, a hard seat, and a less readable cockpit.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore105 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque72 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque6,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders1
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesRocker arm, OHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement693 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandShowaBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandNissinBrandBrembo

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter18 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,434 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019

At first glance, the Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 looks like a classic second motorbike. But in the saddle, it presents itself as a pleasing and accessible universal talent. It makes experienced riders happy and pleases beginners in equal measure. The surcharge on the 401 is considerable, but it pays off at the latest at higher speeds on great motorbike routes. There, the Svartpilen 701 can go at a fast pace!

Great chassis with smooth handling - yet not nervous

Engine is a real gem for single-cylinder fans

Pleasant seating position in city traffic

Pleases even on bad asphalt - very wide range of use.

Vibrations are a little annoying on long motorway journeys

hard seat for driver and passenger

cockpit not very easy to read.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 701

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. Compared to Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 2019 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 110 days for a Husqvarna Svartpilen 701. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 15 reviews for the Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 since model year 2018. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 43,200 views for the first review on Husqvarna Svartpilen 701 published on 11/7/2017.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna Svartpilen 701

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG