BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer impressive power and performance. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R takes the lead with 173 HP, compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 160 HP. The KTM also boasts a higher torque of 144 Nm, while the BMW offers 112 Nm. The KTM has a larger displacement of 1301 ccm, while the BMW has a displacement of 999 ccm. The KTM has a V-twin engine with 2 cylinders, while the BMW has a 4-cylinder engine.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, ensuring a smooth and controlled ride. The BMW has an aluminum frame, while the KTM features a chromium-molybdenum frame. The BMW's frame type is a twin tube, while the KTM's frame type is tubular.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of braking technology, both bikes feature four-piston front brakes with radial technology. However, the KTM also has monoblock technology, which provides even greater braking performance. The KTM also offers advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, while the BMW only has dynamic suspension as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The KTM has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482 mm, compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. The seat height of the KTM is also higher at 835 mm, while the BMW has a seat height of 814 mm. The KTM is lighter with a kerb weight of 189 kg, compared to the BMW's 207 kg. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity, with the KTM offering 18 liters and the BMW offering 17.5 liters.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, and very good electronic helpers. It also has a terrific price/performance ratio and is fast and comfortable on the racetrack and country roads. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is praised for its precise handling, traction control, and powerful engine.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and its dynamic suspension control (DDC) is on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high, which may not be ideal for shorter riders, and the design is subjective and may not appeal to everyone. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014's main weakness is its high price.

Overall, both bikes offer impressive performance and features, but the KTM 1290 Super Duke R has a more powerful engine and advanced rider assistance systems. However, the BMW S 1000 R offers a better price/performance ratio and is more comfortable for everyday riding. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore108 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power173 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque144 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,301 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height835 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014

With all the power and hard "Beast videos" from KTM, this horsepower monster is actually a 100% everyday bike for touring or going to work.

precise handling

traction control

powerful engine

High price

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. A BMW S 1000 R 2014 experiences a loss of 590 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,500 USD and 2,500 USD for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014. Compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a KTM 1290 Super Duke R with 46 days compared to 70 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 11/8/2012.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH