BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2014

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2014

KTM 390 Duke 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2014

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2014

KTM 390 Duke 2014

Technical Specifications BMW G 310 R 2016 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2014

BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power44 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque28 NmTorque35 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement313 ccmDisplacement373.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,374 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)139 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

KTM 390 Duke 2014

KTM 390 Duke 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW G 310 R vs KTM 390 Duke

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG