Suzuki SV 650 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2017

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki SV 650 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2017

The Suzuki SV 650 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2017 are both naked bikes, but they have some significant differences in terms of performance, features, and specifications.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki SV 650 2016 has a V2 engine with 76 horsepower, while the BMW S 1000 R 2017 has an inline 4-cylinder engine with a much higher power output of 165 horsepower. This makes the BMW S 1000 R significantly more powerful and suitable for riders who crave speed and performance.

The torque output of the Suzuki SV 650 is 64 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R has a torque output of 114 Nm. Again, the BMW S 1000 R has a higher torque, which means it will have better acceleration and pulling power.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient and reliable performance. The Suzuki SV 650 has a displacement of 645 cc, while the BMW S 1000 R has a larger displacement of 999 cc. This larger displacement contributes to the BMW's higher power output.

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

In terms of suspension, both bikes have swing arm rear suspensions with monoshock absorbers. However, the Suzuki SV 650 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the BMW S 1000 R has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down fork on the BMW provides better stability and control during aggressive riding.

The chassis of the Suzuki SV 650 is made of steel, while the BMW S 1000 R has an aluminum frame. The aluminum frame on the BMW makes it lighter and more agile, contributing to its superior handling.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front, but the BMW S 1000 R has four-piston calipers compared to the double-piston calipers on the Suzuki SV 650. This means that the BMW will have more stopping power and better braking performance.

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS, which enhances safety during braking. However, the BMW S 1000 R also has dynamic suspension, which adjusts the suspension settings based on riding conditions, making setup adjustments unnecessary.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are similar, with slight variations. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly shorter wheelbase and a higher seat height compared to the Suzuki SV 650. The BMW also has a larger fuel tank capacity, allowing for longer rides without refueling.

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki SV 650 is praised for its agile and powerful engine, comfortable seating position, easy handling, and good control of the brakes. The BMW S 1000 R is praised for its powerful engine, great handling, wide range of equipment options, powerful brakes, and the convenience of its semi-active suspension system.

The Suzuki SV 650 has a weakness in its poorly readable digital tachometer, while the BMW S 1000 R is criticized for its original equipment tires not being of the highest quality and its inactive seating position on the racetrack.

Overall, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 offers superior performance, more advanced features, and a higher level of customization options compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016. However, the Suzuki SV 650 may be a more affordable and accessible option for riders who prioritize comfort and ease of handling.

Technical Specifications Suzuki SV 650 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2017

Suzuki SV 650 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeIn line
BoreBore81 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke62.6 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power76 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,100 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement645 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,130 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)197 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)205 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.8 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

The new SV650 continues the visual minimalism of the first two SV650 generations, but builds technically on its direct predecessor, the SFV650 Gladius - two excellent moves that turn the very modern SV650 into a classic. The design fits wonderfully into the era of many retro conversions, but inside there are also modern gimmicks that make it easier for beginners in particular to get started. The engine, on the other hand, can also convince advanced riders; the typical V2 feeling is wonderful. You shouldn't expect extreme sportiness in the chassis and brakes, but the price of just under 6400 euros (in Germany) is a statement that the competition will have to swallow.

Agile, powerful engine

typical V2 sound

pleasant and low seating position

easy handling

comfortable chassis

brakes with good control

Poorly readable digital tachometer

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW's universal talent also got better in 2017. The BMW offers the widest range of use and an exceptionally cultivated engine, a perfect gearbox and the best shift assistant in the field. It drives simply but quickly. You sit rather low in the vehicle.

Best shift assistant in the nakedbike league

Universal motorbike without any real weaknesses

Powerful engine, awesome sound, great handling

On the racetrack a slightly too inactive riding position

Very wide range of equipment and accessory options

Very powerful brakes

Semi-active suspension makes setup fiddling superfluous

Original equipment tyres not the finest premium goods

Inactive seating position on racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki SV 650 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki SV 650 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2017 is about 130% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2017 there are less Suzuki SV 650 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 11 compared to 22. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki SV 650 with 80 days compared to 97 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 25 reviews for the Suzuki SV 650 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Suzuki SV 650 was published on 9/26/2008 and now has more than 14,200 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price Suzuki SV 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH