BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs BMW F 900 R 2021

The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the BMW F 900 R 2021 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some notable differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is equipped with an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces 160 HP of power and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW F 900 R 2021 features an in-line 2-cylinder engine that generates 105 HP of power and 92 Nm of torque. While the S 1000 R has a larger displacement of 999 ccm, the F 900 R has a displacement of 895 ccm. This indicates that the S 1000 R has a more powerful engine compared to the F 900 R.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock at the rear. This provides good stability and handling for both models. However, the chassis construction differs between the two bikes. The S 1000 R has an aluminum frame, while the F 900 R has a steel frame. The aluminum frame of the S 1000 R offers a lightweight and rigid structure, which can contribute to better performance and handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology. This ensures powerful and efficient braking performance for both models.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the S 1000 R 2015 features dynamic suspension, while the F 900 R 2021 offers ABS, anti-slipping control, and riding modes. These systems enhance safety and control during rides.

Moving on to dimensions and weights, the S 1000 R has a wheelbase of 1439 mm, a seat height of 814 mm, and a kerb weight of 207 kg (with ABS). On the other hand, the F 900 R has a longer wheelbase of 1518 mm, a slightly higher seat height of 815 mm, and a slightly heavier kerb weight of 211 kg (with ABS). The S 1000 R has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the F 900 R's 13 liters.

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The S 1000 R 2015 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position. However, it has some weaknesses, including expensive optional extras, a hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars.

On the other hand, the F 900 R 2021 has several strengths. It offers a great cockpit with functional connectivity, extensive electronics that can be operated logically, and a very accessible but still casual handling. The motorcycle is described as riding bland and reserved, but it can also be wild and sporty when needed. It provides a pleasant seating position and offers a wide choice of equipment and configuration options. Additionally, the suspension allows for a wide range of use, providing both comfort and precise handling. However, the F 900 R has a few weaknesses, such as a slightly stiff gearstick (with and without quickshifter), an engine that runs a little rough and lacks elegance at the top, and a poor splash guard at the rear.

In conclusion, while the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the BMW F 900 R 2021 are both naked bikes from BMW, they have distinct differences in terms of their technical specifications, strengths, and weaknesses. The S 1000 R offers a more powerful engine and a lighter aluminum frame, while the F 900 R provides a great cockpit, extensive electronics, and a wide range of use in terms of suspension. Ultimately, the choice between these two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2015
BMW F 900 R 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

The BMW F 900 R is a full-grown motorbike. 895 cc, 105 hp and 92 Nm smell of versatility. The F 900 R fulfils this promise completely. The motorbike, including electronics and components, does a great job in every situation. But of all things, the heart of the bike, the engine and transmission unit, does not shine in premium gloss.

Great cockpit and functional connectivity

Extensive electronics can be operated logically

Very accessible but still very casual handling

Motorcycle rides bland and reserved but also wild and sporty when needed

Pleasant seating position

Wide choice of equipment and configuration options

Low and high seat options available

Suspension allows wide range of use - comfortable but also direct and precise.

Gearstick a little stiff - with and without quickshifter

Engine runs a little rough and exudes little elegance at the top

Poor splash guard at the rear

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW F 900 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a BMW F 900 R 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2015 is about 12% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2015 experiences a loss of 260 GBP in one year and 610 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 360 GBP and 600 GBP for a BMW F 900 R 2021. Compared to BMW F 900 R 2021 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 17. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 67 days for a BMW F 900 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R since model year 2020. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 154,700 views for the first review on BMW F 900 R published on 05/11/2019.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons