BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs. BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW K 1300 R 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW K 1300 R 2013

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2020 compared to BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020
BMW K 1300 R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke64.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power172 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque140 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,293 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionStrut

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,228 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth856 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,585 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW K 1300 R 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW K 1300 R

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW K 1300 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH