Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 vs. Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 vs Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 compared to Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha Kodiak 450 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	79 mm	Bore	84.5 mm
Stroke	Stroke	50.9 mm	Stroke	75 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12	Compression Ratio	10
Fuel system	Fuel system	Injection	Fuel system	Injection
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Ignition	Ignition	Transistor	Ignition	Transistor
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Belt
Cylinders	Cylinders	4	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Valves	Valves	DOHC	Valves	OHC
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	998 ccm	Displacement	421 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	A-Arm
Travel	Travel	120 mm	Travel	171 mm
Adjustment	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound	Adjustment	Preload

Suspension Rear

Suspension	Suspension	Swing arm	Suspension	A-Arm
Travel	Travel	120 mm	Travel	189 mm
Adjustment	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound	Adjustment	Preload

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	25 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	8 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	12 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	190 mm	Rear tyre width	25 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	55 %	Rear tyre height	10 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	12 inch
Length	Length	2,095 mm	Length	2,035 mm
Width	Width	800 mm	Width	1,180 mm
Height	Height	1,110 mm	Height	1,160 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,400 mm	Wheelbase	1,240 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	825 mm	Seat Height	855 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	17 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

With the SP version, the MT-10 becomes cooler, more desirable and, thanks to the high-quality chassis, better. The semi-active suspension from the R1M is the best in the naked bike league. Highest quality and best function in combination. The chassis also excites on the racetrack. Nevertheless, the MT-10SP is not a racing machine, because the seating position is not active enough for that.

great chassis

high ride comfort / utility comfort due to the electronic chassis

very emotional but nevertheless cultivated engine

pleasant wind protection

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Traction control not up to the level of the Aprilia

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack