Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations. However, there are notable differences in their technical specifications.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a significant advantage with 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012's 135 HP. The BMW also has a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Triumph's 111 Nm. This higher power and torque output of the BMW translates to better acceleration and overall performance.

The number of cylinders also differs between the two bikes, with the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 having 3 cylinders and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 having 4 cylinders. This additional cylinder in the BMW contributes to its higher power output.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Both bikes have a similar displacement, with the Triumph at 1050 ccm and the BMW at 999 ccm. This means that the BMW achieves its higher power output with a smaller engine size, indicating a more efficient design.

In terms of suspension, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down design of the BMW's front suspension provides better stability and handling, especially during aggressive riding.

Both bikes have double disk front brakes with four pistons, but the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 also features radial, monoblock technology. This technology enhances the braking performance and provides a more precise and responsive feel.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are minor differences between the two bikes. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012's 1435 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 requires wider radii and can be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. It also has weaknesses in comfort. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and its Dynamic Damping Control (DDC) system, while effective, can still be on the "hard" side overall. The seat of the BMW is relatively high, and its design is subjective and a matter of personal taste.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers superior power and performance with its higher horsepower and torque, as well as a more efficient engine design. It also has a sportier chassis and better electronic helpers. However, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis, stable brakes, and an inspiring look. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)212 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.

Flawless racing chassis

very precise

relatively stable

inspiring looks

great engine

stable brakes

Requires wide radii

Somewhat complicated to ride in turns

Weaknesses in comfort

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 78 days for the Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2012 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple R was published on 24/10/2011 and now has more than 11,100 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG