BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022 are both powerful naked bikes that offer thrilling performance and advanced rider assistance systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R takes the lead with 180 HP compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 165 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque rating of 140 Nm compared to the BMW's 114 Nm. Both bikes feature fuel injection systems and liquid cooling for optimal performance.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and monoshock absorbers at the rear. The BMW S 1000 R offers adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for both the front and rear suspension, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R offers the same adjustability but with the addition of a single swing arm at the rear.

In terms of chassis, the BMW S 1000 R features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R features a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design. Both frames provide excellent stability and handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. The BMW S 1000 R features radial technology, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R adds monoblock technology for enhanced braking performance.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, traction control, and anti-wheelie features. The BMW S 1000 R also includes hill start assist and a quickshifter, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R adds a shift assistant with blipper.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 1497 mm. The seat height is similar for both bikes, with the BMW at 830 mm and the KTM at 835 mm. The BMW S 1000 R has a kerb weight of 199 kg, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R weighs slightly more at 209 kg.

Both bikes have similar front and rear tire sizes, with the BMW S 1000 R featuring a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R featuring a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 200 mm.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

In terms of fuel capacity and range, the BMW S 1000 R has a larger fuel tank capacity of 16.5 liters compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 16 liters. However, the KTM has a slightly better combined fuel consumption rating of 6.17 l/100km compared to the BMW's 6.2 l/100km. The range is also slightly better for the BMW at 266 km compared to the KTM's 259 km.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R offers a powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and an extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R boasts brutal performance, accessible handling, a fully adjustable and stable chassis, high-quality standard tires, a comfortable seating position, and acceptable fuel consumption.

However, there are also some weaknesses to consider. The BMW S 1000 R has a sluggish shift assistant and its optics may not be 100% coherent. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R, on the other hand, requires additional payment for full equipment and has fiddly indicator operation.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities when choosing between the two.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW S 1000 R 2022
BMW S 1000 R 2022
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore80 mmBore108 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power180 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque140 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,301 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter48 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel125 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65.8 degreeRake64.8 degree
TrailTrail96 mmTrail106 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter240 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRiding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,497 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height835 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange266 kmRange259 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions144 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions145 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.17 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022

The KTM 1290 Super Duke R retains its brute character for 2022 if you take the beast by the horns. But the Hyper Naked from Mattighofen is also convincing in everyday use and presents itself as a mature all-round companion. Small details could use a little love, but nothing that spoils the positive overall impression of the 1290 Super Duke R.

brutal performance

accessible handling

fully adjustable and stable chassis

high quality standard tyres

comfortable seating position

acceptable fuel consumption.

Full equipment wants to be paid for

fiddly indicator operation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. Compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2022 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 16. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 116 days for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 08/11/2012.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen