Yamaha TMAX 560 2021 vs. BMW C 400 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
BMW C 400 GT 2020
Loading...
Overview - Yamaha TMAX 560 2021 vs BMW C 400 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
BMW C 400 GT 2020
Technical Specifications Yamaha TMAX 560 2021 compared to BMW C 400 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
BMW C 400 GT 2020
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 70 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 73 mm | Stroke | 69.6 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 47.6 HP | Engine power | 34 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 55.7 Nm | Torque | 35 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,000 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.9 | Compression Ratio | 11.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Automatic | Transmission Type | Variomatic |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | OHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 562 ccm | Displacement | 350 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 120 mm | Travel | 110 mm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Dual Shock |
Travel | Travel | 117 mm | Travel | 112 mm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Steel |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 267 mm | Diameter | 265 mm |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 282 mm | Diameter | 265 mm |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 15 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 14 inch |
Length | Length | 2,200 mm | Length | 2,210 mm |
Width | Width | 765 mm | Width | 835 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,575 mm | Wheelbase | 1,565 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 800 mm | Seat Height | 775 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 218 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 212 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.8 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha TMAX 560 vs BMW C 400 GT
Price Yamaha TMAX 560
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW C 400 GT
Model year
Current average market prices