Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016 vs. Online Tapo ECO 2020

Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016

Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016

Online Tapo ECO 2020

Online Tapo ECO 2020

Loading...

Overview - Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016 vs Online Tapo ECO 2020

Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016

Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016

Online Tapo ECO 2020

Online Tapo ECO 2020

Technical Specifications Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016 compared to Online Tapo ECO 2020

Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2016
Online Tapo ECO 2020

Engine and Drive Train

StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeVariomaticTransmission TypeVariomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement49.5 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter12 inchFront tyre diameter12 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter12 inchRear tyre diameter12 inch
Dry WeightDry Weight85 kgDry Weight93 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity6.5 lFuel Tank Capacity6.2 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AGSchuberth