BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs. Yamaha MT-10 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs Yamaha MT-10 2016

When comparing the BMW S 1000 R 2021 and the Yamaha MT-10 2016, it is evident that both bikes belong to the naked bike category and share several similarities in terms of engine type, power, torque, fuel system, number of cylinders, cooling system, and suspension design. However, there are also notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine specifications, both bikes feature inline four-cylinder engines with similar displacements. The BMW S 1000 R 2021 offers a slightly higher engine power of 165 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-10 2016, which has 160 HP. Similarly, the BMW model also has a higher torque rating of 114 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 111 Nm. These differences in power and torque may result in slightly better acceleration and top speed for the BMW S 1000 R.

In terms of chassis and suspension, both bikes utilize aluminum frames and feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with monoshock at the rear. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 incorporates a Twin Tube frame design, while the Yamaha MT-10 2016 uses a Deltabox frame type. The choice of frame design can affect the overall rigidity and handling characteristics of the bikes, but it is difficult to determine which one is superior without testing them side by side.

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

When it comes to braking systems, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front with the same diameter of 320 mm. This ensures strong stopping power and effective braking performance for both models. Additionally, both bikes feature ABS and traction control systems as part of their advanced rider assistance systems, providing enhanced safety and stability during various riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-10 2016's 1400 mm. This may contribute to better stability and cornering performance for the BMW model. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 830 mm compared to the Yamaha's 825 mm. However, the Yamaha MT-10 2016 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the BMW's 16.5 liters, potentially offering a longer range between refueling stops.

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 stands out for its powerful engine, excellent brakes, comfortable ergonomics, and high-performance optional extras. It is also praised for its simplicity of operation while still delivering impressive speed and performance. Overall, it is considered a great all-rounder in the naked bike category.

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 2016 is known for its CP4 engine, which provides a strong character and delivers an unmistakable sound. It is highly agile and offers excellent high-speed stability. The bike is also equipped with strong brakes, ensuring reliable stopping power.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2021 is criticized for its quickshifter, which is good but not perfect, and its sound can still be intrusive. Some riders also report vibrations in the handlebars. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 2016 is said to have poor comfort, limited wind protection, and a hard fit, which may affect long-distance touring capabilities.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 and the Yamaha MT-10 2016 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more advanced rider assistance systems, higher power and torque, and better ergonomics, while the Yamaha stands out for its unique engine character, agility, and stability. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2021 compared to Yamaha MT-10 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2021
Yamaha MT-10 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel120 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox
RakeRake66 degreeRake66 degree
TrailTrail96.3 mmTrail102 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth800 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

It's really impressive how BMW always manages to make good motorbikes even better. The sporty S 1000 R with M package and carbon rims looks a bit threatening at first. But even in 2021, the S 1000 R serves up high-tech and performance in a grandiose, usable dosage. The machine rides precisely, handles well but is not tippy. The engine fires out of the corners, but does not overtax. A damn fast motorbike!

Powerful engine

good brakes

comfortable ergonomics

high-priced but high-performance optional extras

simple operation but still very fast

great all-rounder.

Quickshifter good, but not perfect, sound still a bit intrusive

still with vibrations in handlebars

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

The short and stocky MT-10 is the furthest away from the R1 superbike of the renowned power naked bikes, both in terms of looks and chassis, but the heart of the MT-10 is directly descended from the racetrack weapon and fascinates with a uniquely raw sound and power from below thanks to the typical crank pin offset, which, with a modified firing order, ensures this unique character. The resulting 160 hp therefore only seem a little weak on paper compared to the more than 200 hp of the R1, in reality the MT-10 also ignites incredible fireworks. The suspension would probably be too soft for the race track, but it is just right for a country road fight, and the brakes do the same - probably only acceptable for the track, but perfect for the country road.

CP4 engine

strong character

extremely agile

high-speed stability

strong brakes

unmistakable sound

Poor comfort

limited wind protection

hard fit

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-10

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2021 and a Yamaha MT-10 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2021 is about 64% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 2016 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 7. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 67 days compared to 97 days for a Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 20,700 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 published on 17/11/2015.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG