Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 vs BMW S 1000 R 2022

When comparing the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and the BMW S 1000 R 2022, it is clear that both naked bikes offer powerful engines and similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engines, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is equipped with an in-line four-cylinder engine that produces 152 HP of power and 106 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 also features an in-line four-cylinder engine but offers a higher power output of 165 HP and torque of 114 Nm. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of sheer power.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

In terms of handling, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and swing arm suspension in the rear. The suspension on both models can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin-tube frame design. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 offers a slightly larger front brake diameter of 320 mm compared to the 310 mm on the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022. This gives the BMW better braking performance.

When it comes to rider assistance systems, both bikes are equipped with ABS, traction control, and ride-by-wire technology. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 offers additional features such as hill start assist, cornering ABS, quickshifter, and anti-wheelie control. These additional features provide enhanced safety and convenience for the rider.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire sizes, wheelbase, and seat height. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a slightly higher kerb weight of 214 kg compared to the 199 kg of the BMW S 1000 R 2022. The fuel tank capacity is also larger on the Suzuki with 19 liters compared to the 16.5 liters on the BMW. This gives the Suzuki a longer range of 311 km compared to the 266 km of the BMW.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a less comprehensive electronics package compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2022. It lacks a 6-axis IMU and cornering ABS. Additionally, the instruments on the handlebars of the Suzuki are somewhat antiquated and the display is not particularly easy to read. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 is criticized for having a sluggish shift assistant and its optics are not 100% coherent.

In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and the BMW S 1000 R 2022 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a superior engine and excellent shift assistant, while the BMW boasts a more powerful engine and strong brakes. The Suzuki has a more balanced handling and comfortable seating position, while the BMW offers comfortable ergonomics and a good standard equipment package. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
BMW S 1000 R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power152 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore44 mmThrottle Bore48 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC, Drag lever
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter45 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel117 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65.8 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail96 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth810 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)214 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange311 kmRange266 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions122 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions144 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.1 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022

The new GSX-S1000 is an old acquaintance in terms of basic design - the engine and chassis are still from the predecessor. However, the machine has been modernised in many areas and presents itself at an extremely high level, especially visually. Although the engine cannot compete in the league of the super-potent Hyper Nakeds, it functions very harmoniously and powerfully enough. The conventional chassis also strikes a successful compromise between sportiness and comfort. The hammer arguments are definitely the successful design, the standard quickshifter with blipper and, last but not least, the comparatively low price.

superior engine

excellent shift assistant including blipper

balanced handling

bold design

comfortable seating position

very good price

Electronics package not very comprehensive

no 6-axis IMU, no cornering ABS

instruments on the handlebars somewhat antiquated

display not particularly easy to read

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and a BMW S 1000 R 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2022 is about 37% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2022 there are more Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 28 compared to 22. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 130 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 27/09/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG