Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a slight advantage with 125.4 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. Similarly, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 87.5 Nm. This difference in power and torque may result in a more exhilarating riding experience on the Kawasaki Z900 2020.

Another difference lies in the number of cylinders. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a 3-cylinder engine, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a 4-cylinder engine. Generally, more cylinders provide smoother power delivery and better overall performance.

Both models feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. This ensures good handling and stability on both bikes.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and stiffness of the bike, potentially influencing its handling characteristics.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters, ensuring reliable stopping power. Additionally, both models come equipped with ABS as standard, providing an added level of safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 1450 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 795 mm. However, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is lighter with a kerb weight of 191 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 210 kg.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is praised for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and the inclusion of ABS and TC as standard. It also receives positive feedback for its authentic modern design and clean workmanship.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is commended for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, and good equipment. It is also noted for its aggressive looks and value for money.

However, there are also weaknesses associated with each model. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 is criticized for its hard chassis and the seat, which could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design of the bike is already present on many other models, potentially making it less unique.

The Kawasaki Z900 2020, on the other hand, has a menu navigation system that some riders find tiring to navigate. Furthermore, it lacks the option for a quickshifter, which could be a disadvantage for riders who prefer seamless gear shifts.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 boasts a powerful four-cylinder engine and great handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel140 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter300 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter250 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, even if the option of a quickshifter would have been a nice extra. Apart from that: great shot, Kawasaki!

powerful four-cylinder

great handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2020 is about 31% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 34. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 124 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 25/11/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG