BMW R 1200 R 2017 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
BMW R 1200 R 2017
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Overview - BMW R 1200 R 2017 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
BMW R 1200 R 2017
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R 2017 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R 1200 R 2017
The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.
