Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 vs. KTM 790 Duke 2020

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

KTM 790 Duke 2020

KTM 790 Duke 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 vs KTM 790 Duke 2020

The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 and the KTM 790 Duke 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and fuel systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 has a significant advantage with 160 HP compared to the KTM 790 Duke 2020's 105 HP. This higher power output gives the Yamaha a more powerful and thrilling ride.

Both bikes have liquid cooling and a displacement of around 800-1000cc, which is typical for naked bikes in this segment. The Yamaha has four cylinders, while the KTM has two cylinders. The Yamaha's higher cylinder count may provide smoother power delivery and better overall performance.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

In terms of suspension, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 features Öhlins components both at the front and rear, offering superior quality and adjustability. On the other hand, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 uses WP suspension, which is also known for its performance and reliability. However, the Yamaha's suspension offers more adjustment options, including compression, preload, and rebound, compared to the KTM's rear suspension, which only has preload adjustment.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front, but the Yamaha has slightly larger diameter discs at 320mm compared to the KTM's 300mm discs. This may result in slightly better braking performance for the Yamaha.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS and traction control. The Yamaha also has electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, and ride-by-wire throttle, providing a more customizable riding experience. The KTM, on the other hand, offers a quickshifter as standard, allowing for seamless gear shifts without using the clutch.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front tire widths and diameters. However, the Yamaha has a wider rear tire at 190mm compared to the KTM's 180mm. The Yamaha also has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1400mm compared to the KTM's 1475mm. Both bikes have the same seat height at 825mm, providing a comfortable riding position for most riders. The Yamaha also has a larger fuel tank capacity at 17 liters compared to the KTM's 14 liters, offering a longer range between refueling.

KTM 790 Duke 2020

KTM 790 Duke 2020

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 offers a great chassis, high ride comfort, and utility comfort due to the electronic chassis. It also has a very emotional but cultivated engine, pleasant wind protection, and a balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound. On the other hand, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 has a high-revving two-cylinder engine, a quickshifter as standard, a great chassis set-up, playful handling, a high-quality electronics package, a TFT display, and a good price/performance ratio.

In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017's traction control is not up to the level of the Aprilia, and it has a too inactive seating position on the racetrack. The KTM 790 Duke 2020's rear suspension only has spring preload adjustment, limiting its adjustability compared to the Yamaha.

Overall, both the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 and the KTM 790 Duke 2020 are excellent naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers more power, advanced electronic features, and a larger fuel tank, while the KTM offers a quickshifter as standard and a slightly more adjustable rear suspension. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 compared to KTM 790 Duke 2020

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017
KTM 790 Duke 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke65.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power105 HP
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandWP
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel140 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandWP
TravelTravel120 mmTravel150 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTubular
RakeRake66 degreeRake66 degree

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter300 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

With the SP version, the MT-10 becomes cooler, more desirable and, thanks to the high-quality chassis, better. The semi-active suspension from the R1M is the best in the naked bike league. Highest quality and best function in combination. The chassis also excites on the racetrack. Nevertheless, the MT-10SP is not a racing machine, because the seating position is not active enough for that.

great chassis

high ride comfort / utility comfort due to the electronic chassis

very emotional but nevertheless cultivated engine

pleasant wind protection

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Traction control not up to the level of the Aprilia

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

KTM 790 Duke 2020

KTM 790 Duke 2020

A sporty naked bike that not only has enough power, but also playful handling and high-quality equipment - the KTM 790 Duke ticks all the boxes. If the looks don't bother you, it's hard to find anything the 790 can't do well, because in its hunting ground - the country road - it forms a wonderfully rounded package that doesn't really leave anything to be desired. Initial teething troubles have also been solved, which is why the KTM 790 Duke is still a real recommendation!

high-revving two-cylinder

quickshifter + as standard

great chassis set-up

playful handling

high-quality electronics package

TFT display

good price/performance ratio

Suspension spring preload adjustable at the rear only

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-10 SP vs KTM 790 Duke

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 and a KTM 790 Duke 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is about 60% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 experiences a loss of 2,350 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 120 GBP for a KTM 790 Duke 2020. Compared to KTM 790 Duke 2020 there are less Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 25. It takes less time to sell a KTM 790 Duke with 78 days compared to 123 days for the Yamaha MT-10 SP. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 SP and 35 reviews for the KTM 790 Duke since model year 2018. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 SP was published on 04/10/2016 and now has more than 28,600 views. This compares to more than 160,600 views for the first review on KTM 790 Duke published on 09/11/2016.

Price Yamaha MT-10 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 790 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth